* [PATCH v2 2/2] memory: of_fixup: adapt to new memory layout
2019-02-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] of: base: add helper to rename a node Marco Felsch
@ 2019-02-12 15:10 ` Marco Felsch
2019-02-12 20:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] of: base: add helper to rename a node Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2019-02-12 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox; +Cc: mfe
Since kernel 4.16 the memory nodes got a @<reg> suffix so the fixup
won't work correctly anymore, because instead of adapting the extisting
one the fixup creates a new node and keeps the old (maybe incorrect)
node.
To be compatible with the old and new layout delete the found memory
node and create a new one. The new node follows the new @<reg> style.
The patch also renames the node parameter to make it clearer.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
Note:
I've tested the patch on a customer board with one memory bank and on
the imx53 loco-r board with two memory banks. The fixup applies
correctly on both boards. Now I have two memory nodes on the imx53
loco-r board instead of one compared to the upstream dts.
Changelog:
v2:
- delete all memory nodes, not just the first found
- add one /memory node per bank, previous one /memory node for all
banks
common/memory.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/memory.c b/common/memory.c
index 00fa7c50ff..21b2b4f63a 100644
--- a/common/memory.c
+++ b/common/memory.c
@@ -224,39 +224,78 @@ int memory_bank_first_find_space(resource_size_t *retstart,
#ifdef CONFIG_OFTREE
-static int of_memory_fixup(struct device_node *node, void *unused)
+static int of_memory_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *unused)
{
struct memory_bank *bank;
int err;
- int addr_cell_len, size_cell_len, len = 0;
- struct device_node *memnode;
- u8 tmp[16 * 16]; /* Up to 64-bit address + 64-bit size */
+ int addr_cell_len, size_cell_len;
+ struct device_node *memnode, *tmp, *np;
+ char *memnode_name;
- memnode = of_create_node(node, "/memory");
- if (!memnode)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ /*
+ * Since kernel 4.16 the memory node got a @<reg> suffix. To support
+ * the old and the new style delete any found memory node and add it
+ * again to be sure that the memory node exists only once. It shouldn't
+ * bother older kernels if the memory node has this suffix so adding it
+ * following the new style.
+ */
- err = of_property_write_string(memnode, "device_type", "memory");
- if (err)
- return err;
+ for_each_child_of_node_safe(root, tmp, np) {
+ const char *device_type;
- addr_cell_len = of_n_addr_cells(memnode);
- size_cell_len = of_n_size_cells(memnode);
+ err = of_property_read_string(np, "device_type", &device_type);
+ if (err || of_node_cmp("memory", device_type))
+ continue;
+
+ /* delete every found memory node */
+ of_delete_node(np);
+ }
+
+ addr_cell_len = of_n_addr_cells(root);
+ size_cell_len = of_n_size_cells(root);
for_each_memory_bank(bank) {
- of_write_number(tmp + len, bank->start, addr_cell_len);
+ u8 tmp[16]; /* Up to 64-bit address + 64-bit size */
+ int len = 0;
+
+ /* Create a /memory node for each bank */
+ memnode_name = basprintf("/memory@%lx", bank->start);
+ if (!memnode_name) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+
+ memnode = of_create_node(root, memnode_name);
+ if (!memnode) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_free;
+ }
+
+ err = of_property_write_string(memnode, "device_type",
+ "memory");
+ if (err)
+ goto err_free;
+
+ of_write_number(tmp, bank->start, addr_cell_len);
len += addr_cell_len * 4;
of_write_number(tmp + len, bank->size, size_cell_len);
len += size_cell_len * 4;
- }
- err = of_set_property(memnode, "reg", tmp, len, 1);
- if (err) {
- pr_err("could not set reg %s.\n", strerror(-err));
- return err;
+ err = of_set_property(memnode, "reg", tmp, len, 1);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("could not set reg %s.\n", strerror(-err));
+ goto err_free;
+ }
+
+ free(memnode_name);
}
return 0;
+
+err_free:
+ free(memnode_name);
+err_out:
+ return err;
}
static int of_register_memory_fixup(void)
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: base: add helper to rename a node
2019-02-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] of: base: add helper to rename a node Marco Felsch
2019-02-12 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] memory: of_fixup: adapt to new memory layout Marco Felsch
@ 2019-02-12 20:23 ` Sascha Hauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2019-02-12 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Felsch; +Cc: barebox, mfe
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:10:40PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Sometimes it can be necessary to rename a node, e.g. a upstream node was
> renamed and the whole board logic depends on the old naming scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Note:
> In my v1 this patch was required for the followed, but now it isn't. So
> feel free to add or drop it. IMHO it can be a useful helper in the
> future.
Indeed it can be, but as it's currently unused I only applied 2/2.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread