mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	lst@pengutronix.de, ore@pengutronix.de, rcz@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: cache-armv7: start invalidation from outer levels
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 19:18:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190423171852.26126-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423171852.26126-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

The ARM Cortex-A Series Programmer's Guide notes[1]:
> Some care is required with cache maintenance activity in multi-core
> systems that include a L2C-310 L2 cache (or similar). Cleaning or
> invalidating the L1 cache and L2 cache will not be a single atomic
> operation. A core might therefore perform cache maintenance on
> a particular address in both L1 and L2 caches only as two discrete
> steps. If another core were to access the affected address between
> those two actions, a coherency problem can occur. Such problems can
> be avoided by following two simple rules.
>
> * When cleaning, always clean the innermost (L1) cache first and then
>   clean the outer cache(s).
> * When invalidating, always invalidate the outermost cache first and
>   the L1 cache last.

The current code correctly iterates from inner to outer cache levels
when flushing/cleaning (r8 == 0), invalidation (r8 == 1) occurs in the
same direction though. Adjust the invalidation iteration order to start
from the outermost cache instead.

Equivalent C-Code:

	enum cache_op { CACHE_FLUSH = 0, CACHE_INVAL = 1 };
	register enum cache_op operation asm("r8");
	register int i asm("r12");
	register int limit asm("r3") = max_cache_level << 1; // e.g. 4 with L2 max

	+if (operation == CACHE_FLUSH) {
	 	i = 0;
	+} else {
	+	i = limit - 2;
	+}

	 bool loop_again;
	 do {
		/* [snip] */
	+	if (operation == CACHE_FLUSH) {
			i += 2;
			loop_again = limit > i;
	+	} else {
	+		loop_again = i > 0;
	+		i -= 2;
	+	}
	} while (loop_again);

[1]: 18.6 "TLB and cache maintenance broadcast", Version 4.0

Suggested-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S b/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S
index 0eb0ecfee756..b2d70bece7b9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S
@@ -83,7 +83,10 @@ hierarchical:
 		ands	r3, r0, #0x7000000	@ extract loc from clidr
 		mov	r3, r3, lsr #23		@ left align loc bit field
 		beq	finished		@ if loc is 0, then no need to clean
-		mov	r12, #0			@ start clean at cache level 0
+		cmp	r8, #0
+THUMB(		ite	eq			)
+		moveq	r12, #0
+		subne	r12, r3, #2		@ start invalidate at outmost cache level
 loop1:
 		add	r2, r12, r12, lsr #1	@ work out 3x current cache level
 		mov	r1, r0, lsr r2		@ extract cache type bits from clidr
@@ -118,8 +121,15 @@ THUMB(		ite	eq			)
 		subs	r7, r7, #1		@ decrement the index
 		bge	loop2
 skip:
+		cmp	r8, #0
+		bne	inval_check
 		add	r12, r12, #2		@ increment cache number
 		cmp	r3, r12
+		b	loop_end_check
+inval_check:
+		cmp	r12, #0
+		sub	r12, r12, #2		@ decrement cache number
+loop_end_check:
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_814220
 		dsb
 #endif
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-23 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 17:18 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: mmu: misc armv7 cache/MMU fixes Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: cache-armv7: add work-around for errata 814220 Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:39   ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-25 10:38     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-25 10:02   ` Lucas Stach
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: imx: work around i.MX6UL ERR008958 (ARM errata 814220) Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:41   ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-25 10:39     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:18 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2019-04-23 17:21   ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: cache-armv7: start invalidation from outer levels Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-25  9:57     ` Lucas Stach
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: mmu: remove doubly defined macro Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: mmu: mark uncached regions as eXecute never on v7 Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190423171852.26126-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lst@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=ore@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=rcz@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox