From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] treewide: remove CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO from defconfigs
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 22:41:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620204101.GB12106@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620142945.mxvvrslfz6vp2wkn@pengutronix.de>
Hi Sascha.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 04:29:45PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:54:21AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Antony
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > > The commit b917f7864115a35 ("remove CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO")
> > > has dropped Kconfig DEBUG_INFO option however we
> > > still have very many DEBUG_INFO mentions in defconfig
> > > files. Drop them using sed:
> > >
> > > find -iname '*defconfig' -type f -exec \
> > > sed -i "/CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y/d" {} ';'
> > Another approach could be to regenerate all defconfigs.
> > A little scripting around savedefconfig should do it.
> >
> > Then we would get rid of all obsolete symbols in one go - for all
> > defconfigs.
> >
> > The generated defconfig would be the one that people would be using
> > anyway, so there should be only a little risk to introduce new issues
> > doing it this way.
> >
> > Willing to try this approcah - maybe across all architectures?
>
> I once thought the same and came up with this little thing:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> for a in arch/*; do
> arch=$(basename $a)
> for c in $a/configs/*; do
> config=$(basename $c)
> export ARCH=$arch
> make $config && make savedefconfig && mv defconfig $c
> done
> done
>
> Just tested, still works. Maybe I should just run this from time to time
> and commit the result. What do you think?
Me like.
Much better than removing individual CONFIG symbols.
The diff is not scary:
84 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
Maybe part of your release scripts - then you could evaluate
if the changes are worth it?
Or maybe add the script to barebox so anyone could do it, when
they want to get rid of a symbol.
that would be better than sed scripts.
Actually I like the latter idea the best, then we could better
distribute the task and let anyone do it.
I'm a bit occupied, so hope someone else jumps to do it.
Sam
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 8:25 Antony Pavlov
2019-06-20 8:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-06-20 14:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-06-20 20:21 ` Antony Pavlov
2019-06-20 20:41 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2019-07-01 12:41 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190620204101.GB12106@ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox