From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu ([92.103.151.219]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1irPk1-00075Z-RW for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:12:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 18:12:26 +0100 From: Jules Maselbas Message-ID: <20200114171226.evt4nvuxe7gdc5bb@tellis.lin.mbt.kalray.eu> References: <20191220143232.28354-10-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20200114132112.4119-1-jmaselbas@kalray.eu> <20200114142704.3t7vra5wlrzivi3n@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200114142704.3t7vra5wlrzivi3n@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] usb: dwc2 host driver To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Barebox List On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 03:27:04PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Jules, > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 02:21:05PM +0100, Jules Maselbas wrote: > > Hi Sascha, > > > > I've been working on a driver for the dwc2 otg controller, for both host > > and device mode. Like you I've started from U-Boot driver and I mixed > > it with some part from Linux. For instance I've removed the register > > structs and I've been using the same defines for register bit-fields as > > in Linux. > > > > I would like to share my version of the host driver, as the gadget driver > > one still requires some cleanup. This series is not to be applied on the > > driver you proposed. However I am willing to propose a new series that can > > be applied on the driver you proposed. What do you think? > > The dwc2 driver was a quick shot, I am all in for improvements. Removing > the register structs is very nice and I would be interested in gadget > support as well. The gadget support is almost ready, I got the dfu gadget working. :) > What SoC are you using the driver on? I am using this driver on our custom SoC, the Kalray Coolidge MPPA (k1c). I didn't tried on other SoC. > I am not sure if it makes sense to rebase your patches on my driver. If > you can convince me that yours is better then we could just remove mine > and merge yours instead. I don't have a strong argument in favor of my version. Except that I have already made some changes over the original U-Boot version: I've tried to improve the roothub interface making it easier to decode new requests. I have removed the memcpy done in transfer_chunk between the usb data buffer and the dma buffer :/ However this mean that all buffer used for usb tranfert must be dma capable. Not all usb transfers use dma_alloc for it's buffers but sometime they are allocated on the stack, this can be problematic if the stack cannot be used by DMA. I also have fixed an error in the handling of the toggle bit, but I think the solution is a bit hacky. I think the driver should rather use the toggle bit stored in the usb_device structure, but this will require more rework. If theses changes make sense then let's use this version. Best, Jules > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox