mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: nios2 and openrisc in barebox
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:44:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210224084421.GG5549@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210224100646.41d718b1801959a0b47e3f75@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:06:46AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:13:44 +0100
> Franck Jullien <franck.jullien@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Le mar. 23 févr. 2021 à 10:59, Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi Franck, Antony
> > >
> > > Are you still interested in barebox support for NIOS2 and openrisc? If
> > > not I would consider removing it. Background is that we are planning to
> > > introduce green threads and implement pollers with them which makes
> > > green threads rather mandatory. Green threads need a setjmp/longjmp
> > > implementation that would have to be added for these architectures.
> > >
> > > Keeping the architectures is no big deal normally, but I don't want to
> > > add untested new functionality, also I don't want to implement things
> > > that nobody uses, so if you are still interested it would be great if
> > > you volunteer to implement setjmp/longjmp.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >   Sascha
> > >
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for asking.
> > 
> > I don't think anyone is using (has ever used ?) Barebox on these architectures.
> > 
> > I do have a product which uses Barebox and a NIOS2 in the field.
> > It's working for 10+ years already but will never be updated.
> > 
> > I think you can drop support for them. I won't work on this myself.
> > Let's wait for Antony's view on this.
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I experimented with openrisc before widespread use of RISC-V.
> I have never used nios2.
> 
> IMHO we can drop openrisc and nios2.

Ok, thanks for your input. Let's go for it.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-24  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23  9:59 Sascha Hauer
2021-02-23 13:13 ` Franck Jullien
2021-02-24  7:06   ` Antony Pavlov
2021-02-24  8:44     ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2021-02-25  7:17 ` Yann Sionneau
2021-02-25 12:45   ` Stafford Horne
2021-02-25 13:02     ` Jules Maselbas
2021-02-25 15:33       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-02-25 17:39         ` Antony Pavlov
2021-02-25 21:12           ` Stafford Horne
2021-03-01 11:05         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-01 11:17           ` Jules Maselbas
2021-03-01 12:18           ` Stafford Horne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210224084421.GG5549@pengutronix.de \
    --to=sha@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=antonynpavlov@gmail.com \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox