From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/9] net: add DSA framework to support basic switch functionality
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:31:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220328103139.GT12181@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321092606.1459834-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Add DSA based port multiplexing functionality for barebox. With this
> framework we will be able to use different ports of as switch
> separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/net/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/dsa.c | 385 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/dsa.h | 94 +++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 483 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa.c
> create mode 100644 include/dsa.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> index b583299a44..419f8c515d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ config HAS_MACB
> config PHYLIB
> bool
>
> +config DSA
> + bool
> +
> menu "Network drivers"
> depends on NET
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile
> index 563dfdfd9e..ef3513a6b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DSA) += dsa.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHYLIB) += phy/
> obj-$(CONFIG_NET_USB) += usb/
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa.c b/drivers/net/dsa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..a9e3563b9b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,385 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <dma.h>
> +#include <dsa.h>
> +#include <of_net.h>
> +
> +static int dsa_port_probe(struct eth_device *edev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> + const struct dsa_ops *ops = ds->ops;
> + phy_interface_t interface;
> + int ret;
> +
> + interface = of_get_phy_mode(dp->dev.device_node);
> + ret = phy_device_connect(edev, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, interface);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ops->port_probe) {
> + ret = ops->port_probe(dp, dp->index, dp->edev.phydev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void dsa_port_set_ethaddr(struct eth_device *edev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> +
> + if (is_valid_ether_addr(edev->ethaddr))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!is_valid_ether_addr(ds->edev_master->ethaddr))
> + return;
> +
> + eth_set_ethaddr(edev, ds->edev_master->ethaddr);
You are setting a ports MAC address here. Shouldn't this be different
from the master MAC address?
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_port_start(struct eth_device *edev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> + const struct dsa_ops *ops = ds->ops;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!dp->edev.phydev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + dsa_port_set_ethaddr(edev);
> +
> + ret = phy_wait_aneg_done(dp->edev.phydev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ops->port_enable) {
> + ret = ops->port_enable(dp, dp->index, dp->edev.phydev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + }
> +
> + if (!ds->cpu_port_active) {
> + struct dsa_port *dpc = ds->dp[ds->cpu_port];
> + ret = ops->port_enable(dpc, ds->cpu_port,
> + ds->cpu_port_fixed_phy);
Is ops->port_enable optional or not?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + eth_open(ds->edev_master);
> + ds->cpu_port_active = true;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Stop the desired port, the CPU port and the master Eth interface */
> +static void dsa_port_stop(struct eth_device *edev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> + const struct dsa_ops *ops = ds->ops;
> +
> + if (ops->port_disable)
> + ops->port_disable(dp, dp->index, dp->edev.phydev);
This suggests ops->port_disable is optional...
> +
> +
> + if (ds->cpu_port_active) {
> + struct dsa_port *dpc = ds->dp[ds->cpu_port];
> + ops->port_disable(dpc, ds->cpu_port, ds->cpu_port_fixed_phy);
... but it's called unconditionally here.
> + eth_close(ds->edev_master);
This function stops a single port. Is it correct to call eth_close on
the master device here? What if other ports are still active?
> + ds->cpu_port_active = false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_port_send(struct eth_device *edev, void *packet, int length)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> + struct eth_device *edev_master;
> + const struct dsa_ops *ops = ds->ops;
> + void *tx_buf = ds->tx_buf;
> + size_t full_length;
> + int ret;
> +
> + full_length = length + ds->needed_headroom;
> +
> + if (full_length > DSA_PKTSIZE)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(tx_buf + ds->needed_headroom, packet, length);
> + ret = ops->xmit(dp, dp->index, tx_buf, full_length);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + edev_master = ds->edev_master;
> +
> + return edev_master->send(edev_master, tx_buf, full_length);
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_port_recv(struct eth_device *edev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + int length;
> +
> + if (!dp->rx_buf_length)
> + return 0;
> +
> + net_receive(edev, dp->rx_buf, dp->rx_buf_length);
> + length = dp->rx_buf_length;
> + dp->rx_buf_length = 0;
> +
> + return length;
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_ether_set_ethaddr(struct eth_device *edev,
> + const unsigned char *adr)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> + struct eth_device *edev_master;
> +
> + edev_master = ds->edev_master;
> +
> + return edev_master->set_ethaddr(edev_master, adr);
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_ether_get_ethaddr(struct eth_device *edev, unsigned char *adr)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = edev->priv;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> + struct eth_device *edev_master;
> +
> + edev_master = ds->edev_master;
> +
> + return edev_master->get_ethaddr(edev_master, adr);
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_switch_regiser_edev(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> + struct device_node *dn, int port)
s/regiser/register/
> +{
> + struct eth_device *edev;
> + struct device_d *dev;
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ds->dp[port] = xzalloc(sizeof(*dp));
> +
> + dp = ds->dp[port];
> + dev = &dp->dev;
> +
> + dev_set_name(dev, "dsa_port");
> + dev->id = DEVICE_ID_DYNAMIC;
> + dev->parent = ds->dev;
> + dev->device_node = dn;
> +
> + ret = register_device(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + dp->rx_buf = xmalloc(DSA_PKTSIZE);
> + dp->ds = ds;
> + dp->index = port;
> +
> + edev = &dp->edev;
> + edev->priv = dp;
> + edev->parent = dev;
> + edev->init = dsa_port_probe;
> + edev->open = dsa_port_start;
> + edev->send = dsa_port_send;
> + edev->recv = dsa_port_recv;
> + edev->halt = dsa_port_stop;
> + edev->get_ethaddr = dsa_ether_get_ethaddr;
> + edev->set_ethaddr = dsa_ether_set_ethaddr;
> +
> + return eth_register(edev);
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_rx_preprocessor(struct eth_device* edev, unsigned char **packet,
> + int *length)
> +{
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = edev->rx_preprocessor_priv;
> + const struct dsa_ops *ops = ds->ops;
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
> + int ret, port;
> +
> + ret = ops->rcv(ds, &port, *packet, *length);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *length -= ds->needed_headroom;
> + *packet += ds->needed_headroom;
> +
> + if (port > DSA_MAX_PORTS)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + dp = ds->dp[port];
> + if (!dp)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (*length > DSA_PKTSIZE)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (dp->rx_buf_length)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + memcpy(dp->rx_buf, *packet, *length);
> + dp->rx_buf_length = *length;
> +
> + return -ENOMSG;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int dsa_switch_regiser_master(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + struct device_node *master, int port)
> +{
s/regiser/register/
> + struct device_node *phy_node;
> + struct phy_device *phydev;
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
> +
> + of_device_ensure_probed(master);
> +
> + if (ds->edev_master) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "master was already registered!\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ds->edev_master = of_find_eth_device_by_node(master);
> + if (!ds->edev_master) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "can't find ethernet master device\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + ds->edev_master->rx_preprocessor = dsa_rx_preprocessor;
> + ds->edev_master->rx_preprocessor_priv = ds;
> +
> + phydev = phy_device_create(NULL, 0, 0);
> +
> + phydev->registered = 1;
> + phydev->link = 1;
> +
> + phy_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "fixed-link");
> + if (!phy_node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(phy_node, "speed", &phydev->speed))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + phydev->duplex = of_property_read_bool(phy_node,"full-duplex");
> + phydev->pause = of_property_read_bool(phy_node, "pause");
> + phydev->asym_pause = of_property_read_bool(phy_node, "asym-pause");
We already have a function parsing these properties. Could we
consolidate that?
> + phydev->interface = of_get_phy_mode(np);
> +
> + ds->dp[port] = xzalloc(sizeof(*dp));
> + dp = ds->dp[port];
> + dp->ds = ds;
> +
> + ds->cpu_port = port;
> + ds->cpu_port_fixed_phy = phydev;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> + struct device_node *dn)
> +{
> + struct device_node *ports, *port;
> + int ret = 0;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + ports = of_get_child_by_name(dn, "ports");
> + if (!ports) {
> + /* The second possibility is "ethernet-ports" */
> + ports = of_get_child_by_name(dn, "ethernet-ports");
> + if (!ports) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "no ports child node found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(ports, port) {
> + struct device_node *master;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(port, "reg", ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "No or too many ports are configured\n");
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
> +
> + if (reg >= ds->num_ports) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "port %pOF index %u exceeds num_ports (%u)\n",
> + port, reg, ds->num_ports);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
> +
> + master = of_parse_phandle(port, "ethernet", 0);
> + if (master)
> + dsa_switch_regiser_master(ds, port, master, reg);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(ports, port) {
> + struct device_node *master;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(port, "reg", ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "No or too many ports are configured\n");
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
You won't hit this case here, it is already caught above.
> +
> + if (reg >= ds->num_ports) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "port %pOF index %u exceeds num_ports (%u)\n",
> + port, reg, ds->num_ports);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
ditto
> +
> + master = of_parse_phandle(port, "ethernet", 0);
> + if (!master) {
> + ret = dsa_switch_regiser_edev(ds, port, reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "Can't create edev for port %i\n", reg);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> +out_put_node:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> + struct device_node *dn;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!ds->dev) {
> + pr_err("No dev is set\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + ds->tx_buf = dma_alloc(DSA_PKTSIZE);
> + dn = ds->dev->device_node;
> +
> + if (!ds->num_ports || ds->num_ports > DSA_MAX_PORTS) {
> + dev_err(ds->dev, "No or too many ports are configured\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (dn)
> + ret = dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(ds, dn);
> + else
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return ret;
Please clean up ret handling.
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_register_switch);
> +
> diff --git a/include/dsa.h b/include/dsa.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..e97f90c13d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dsa.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2019-2021 NXP
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DSA_H__
> +#define __DSA_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/phy.h>
> +#include <net.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * DSA stands for Distributed Switch Architecture and it is infrastructure
> + * intended to support drivers for Switches that rely on an intermediary
> + * Ethernet device for I/O. These switches may support cascading allowing
> + * them to be arranged as a tree.
> + * DSA is documented in detail in the Linux kernel documentation under
> + * Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.txt
> + * The network layout of such a switch is shown below:
> + *
> + * |------|
> + * | eth0 | <--- master eth device (regular eth driver)
> + * |------|
> + * ^ |
> + * tag added by switch -->| |
> + * | |
> + * | |<-- tag added by DSA driver
> + * | v
> + * |--------------------------------------|
> + * | | CPU port | | <-- DSA (switch) device
> + * | ------------ | (DSA driver)
> + * | _________ _________ _________ |
> + * | | port0 | | port1 | ... | portn | | <-- ports as eth devices
> + * |-+-------+--+-------+-------+-------+-| ('dsa-port' eth driver)
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#define DSA_PORT_NAME_LENGTH 16
> +#define DSA_MAX_PORTS 12
> +#define DSA_PKTSIZE 1538
> +
> +struct dsa_port;
> +struct dsa_switch;
> +/**
> + * struct dsa_ops - DSA operations
> + *
> + * @port_probe: Initialize a switch port.
> + * @port_enable: Enable I/O for a port.
> + * @port_disable: Disable I/O for a port.
> + * @xmit: Insert the DSA tag for transmission.
> + * DSA drivers receive a copy of the packet with headroom and
> + * tailroom reserved and set to 0. 'packet' points to headroom
> + * and 'length' is updated to include both head and tailroom.
> + * @rcv: Process the DSA tag on reception and return the port index
> + * from the h/w provided tag. Return the index via 'portp'.
> + * 'packet' and 'length' describe the frame as received from
> + * master including any additional headers.
> + */
> +struct dsa_ops {
> + int (*port_probe)(struct dsa_port *dp, int port,
> + struct phy_device *phy);
> + int (*port_enable)(struct dsa_port *dp, int port,
> + struct phy_device *phy);
> + void (*port_disable)(struct dsa_port *dp, int port,
> + struct phy_device *phy);
> + int (*xmit)(struct dsa_port *dp, int port, void *packet, int length);
> + int (*rcv)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int *portp, void *packet, int length);
> +};
> +
> +struct dsa_port {
> + struct device_d dev;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds;
> + unsigned int index;
> + struct eth_device edev;
> + unsigned char *rx_buf;
> + size_t rx_buf_length;
> +};
> +
> +struct dsa_switch {
> + struct device_d *dev;
> + const struct dsa_ops *ops;
> + size_t num_ports;
> + u32 cpu_port;
> + bool cpu_port_active;
> + struct eth_device *edev_master;
> + struct phy_device *cpu_port_fixed_phy;
> + struct dsa_port *dp[DSA_MAX_PORTS];
> + size_t needed_headroom;
> + void *tx_buf;
> +};
> +
> +int dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds);
> +
> +#endif /* __DSA_H__ */
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 9:25 [PATCH v1 0/9] add basic DSA support Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:25 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] net: add RX preprocessor support Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:25 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] net: add of_find_eth_device_by_node() function Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] net: add DSA framework to support basic switch functionality Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-25 9:37 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-28 10:31 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2022-03-28 12:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] driver: add dev_get_priv() helper Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] net: port part of if_vlan header from kernel v5.17 Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] spi: port spi_sync_transfer() function " Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] net: mdio: add MDIO_DEVAD_NONE define Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] net: phy: make sure MDIO bus is probed if we search for the PHY Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-21 9:26 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] net: dsa: add support for SJA11xx switches Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-28 10:40 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220328103139.GT12181@pengutronix.de \
--to=sha@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox