From: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] doc: slightly improve the porting guide
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:05:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021090510.399348-1-rhi@pengutronix.de> (raw)
Turn the first board code excerpt into a full example by adding the
necessary includes files. Then in the line-by-line explanation, ensure a
line break after each explained line by turning the list into a
definition list, and be a bit more verbose when explaining some lines.
Signed-off-by: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>
---
Documentation/devel/porting.rst | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devel/porting.rst b/Documentation/devel/porting.rst
index 01ee26e0d65f..dea5ebd1c511 100644
--- a/Documentation/devel/porting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/devel/porting.rst
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ there depends on the previously running code. If a previous stage has already
initialized the DRAM, the only thing you need to do is to set up a stack and
call the common PBL code with a memory region and your device tree blob::
+ #include <asm/barebox-arm.h>
+ #include <console.h>
+
ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK(start_my_board, MY_STACK_TOP, r0, r1, r2)
{
extern char __dtb_my_board_start[];
@@ -128,22 +131,24 @@ call the common PBL code with a memory region and your device tree blob::
Lets look at this line by line:
- - ``ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK(start_my_board, STACK_TOP, r0, r1, r2)``
+``ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK(start_my_board, MY_STACK_TOP, r0, r1, r2)``
The entry point is special: It needs to be located at the beginning of the
image, it does not return and may run before a stack is set up.
To make it possible to write this entry point in C, the macro places
- a machine code prologue that uses ``STACK_TOP`` as the initial stack
+ a machine code prologue that uses ``MY_STACK_TOP`` as the initial stack
pointer. If the stack is already set up, you may pass 0 here.
Additionally, the macro passes along a number of registers, in case the
Boot ROM has placed something interesting there.
- - ``extern char __dtb_my_board_start[];``
+``extern char __dtb_my_board_start[];``
When a device tree is built as part of the PBL, ``__dtb_*_start`` and
- ``__dtb_*_end`` will be defined for it. Declare the start variable, so
- you can pass along the address of the device tree.
+ ``__dtb_*_end`` will be defined for it by the build system;
+ its name is determined by the name of the device tree source file.
+ Declare the start variable, so you can pass along the address of the device
+ tree.
- - ``relocate_to_current_adr();``
+``relocate_to_current_adr();``
Machine code contains a mixture of relative and absolute addressing.
Because the PBL doesn't know in advance which address it's loaded to,
the link address of global variables may not be correct. To correct
@@ -152,28 +157,34 @@ Lets look at this line by line:
by this function. Note that this is self-modifying code, so it's not
safe to call this when executing in-place from flash or ROM.
- - ``setup_c();``
+``setup_c();``
As a size optimization, zero-initialized variables of static storage
duration are not written to the executable. Instead only the region
where they should be located is described and at runtime that region
is zeroed. This is what ``setup_c()`` does.
- - ``pbl_set_putc(my_serial_putc, (void *)BASE_ADDR);``
+``pbl_set_putc(my_serial_putc, (void *)BASE_ADDR);``
Now that we have a C environment set up, lets set our first global
- variable. ``pbl_set_putc`` saves a function pointer that can be used
- to output a single character. This can be used for the early PBL
- console to output messages even before any drivers are initialized.
+ variable. ``pbl_set_putc`` saves a pointer to a function
+ (``my_serial_putc``) that is called by the ``pr_*`` functions to output a
+ single character. This can be used for the early PBL console to output
+ messages even before any drivers are initialized.
+ The second parameter (UART register base address in this instance) is passed
+ as a user parameter when the provided function is called.
- - ``barebox_arm_entry`` will compute a new stack top from the supplied memory
- region and uncompress barebox proper and pass along its arguments.
+``barebox_arm_entry(...)``
+ This will compute a new stack top from the supplied memory
+ region, uncompress barebox proper and pass along its arguments.
Looking at other boards you might see some different patterns:
- - ``*_cpu_lowlevel_init();``: Often some common initialization and quirk handling
+``*_cpu_lowlevel_init();``
+ Often some common initialization and quirk handling
needs to be done at start. If a board similar to yours does this, you probably
want to do likewise.
- - ``__naked``: All functions called before stack is correctly initialized must be
+``__naked``
+ All functions called before stack is correctly initialized must be
marked with this attribute. Otherwise, function prologue and epilogue may access
the uninitialized stack. Note that even with ``__naked``, the compiler may still
spill excess local C variables used in a naked function to the stack before it
@@ -187,34 +198,39 @@ Looking at other boards you might see some different patterns:
no reason to use ``__naked``, just use ``ENTRY_FNCTION_WITHSTACK`` with a zero
stack top.
- - ``noinline``: Compiler code inlining is oblivious to stack manipulation in
+``noinline``
+ Compiler code inlining is oblivious to stack manipulation in
inline assembly. If you want to ensure a new function has its own stack frame
(e.g. after setting up the stack in a ``__naked`` function), you must jump to
a ``__noreturn noinline`` function.
- - ``arm_setup_stack``: For 32-bit ARM, ``arm_setup_stack`` initializes the stack
+``arm_setup_stack``
+ For 32-bit ARM, ``arm_setup_stack`` initializes the stack
top when called from a naked C function, which allowed to write the entry point
directly in C. Modern code should use ``ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK`` instead.
Note that in both cases the stack pointer will be decremented before pushing values.
Avoid interleaving with C-code. See ``__naked`` above for more details.
- - ``__dtb_z_my_board_start[];``: Because the PBL normally doesn't parse anything out
+``__dtb_z_my_board_start[];``
+ Because the PBL normally doesn't parse anything out
of the device tree blob, boards can benefit from keeping the device tree blob
compressed and only unpack it in barebox proper. Such LZO-compressed device trees
are prefixed with ``__dtb_z_``. It's usually a good idea to use this.
- - ``imx6q_barebox_entry(...);`` Sometimes it's possible to query the memory
+``imx6q_barebox_entry(...);``
+ Sometimes it's possible to query the memory
controller for the size of RAM. If there are SoC-specific helpers to achieve
this, you should use them.
- - ``get_runtime_offset()/global_variable_offset()`` returns the difference
+``get_runtime_offset()/global_variable_offset()``
+ This functions return the difference
between the link and load address. This is zero after relocation, but the
function can be useful to pass along the correct address of a variable when
relocation has not yet occurred. If you need to use this for anything more
then passing along the FDT address, you should reconsider and probably rather
call ``relocate_to_current_adr();``.
- - ``*_start_image(...)/*_load_image(...)/*_xload_*(...)``:
+``*_start_image(...)/*_load_image(...)/*_xload_*(...)``
If the SRAM couldn't fit both PBL and the compressed barebox proper, PBL
will need to chainload full barebox binary from disk.
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 9:05 Roland Hieber [this message]
2022-10-24 6:41 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021090510.399348-1-rhi@pengutronix.de \
--to=rhi@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox