From: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
To: John Watts <contact@jookia.org>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: i.MX: early: Use a custom delay on i.MX6
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 08:35:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230202073527.GK13319@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201094435.1228362-1-contact@jookia.org>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 08:44:35PM +1100, John Watts wrote:
> The i.MX early I2C code requires waiting for the controller to settle
> after configuration. This is currently done using udelay which is
> supported on ARMv8 but not on ARMv7.
>
> For the i.MX6 we will have to use a custom delay. This was only
> tested on the i.MX6Q but should work on all other i.MX6 chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Watts <contact@jookia.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-early.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-early.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-early.c
> index 6c8bdc7904..30cc65ca86 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-early.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-early.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,28 @@ static int i2c_fsl_acked(struct fsl_i2c *fsl_i2c)
> return i2c_fsl_poll_status(fsl_i2c, 0, I2SR_RXAK);
> }
>
> +static void i2c_fsl_settle(struct fsl_i2c *fsl_i2c)
> +{
> +#ifdef CPU_ARCH_ARMv8
> + udelay(100);
> +#else
> + /*
> + * We lack udelay on the i.MX6 prebootloader, so delay
> + * manually: On an i.MX6 with a 66Mhz I2C peripheral clock
> + * one cycle of this loop takes 1.30us,
> + * this means we have to wait for 76.9 microseconds.
> + *
> + * This clock may be 44Mhz if the BT_FREQ eFUSE is set,
> + * this just means it will take 150 microseconds.
> + */
I rounded up to 100 cycles and rephrased this to be a little less i.MX6
centric:
/*
* We lack udelay on the 32bit i.MX SoCs, so delay manually: On an
* i.MX6 with a 66Mhz I2C peripheral clock one cycle of this loop
* takes 1.30us. Let's be generous and round up to 100 cycles. Other
* i.MX SoCs do not have a higher peripheral clock, so we should be
* safe here as well.
*/
In the end it doesn't hurt when it takes a little longer.
Applied, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 9:44 John Watts
2023-02-02 7:35 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2023-02-02 7:58 ` John Watts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230202073527.GK13319@pengutronix.de \
--to=sha@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=contact@jookia.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox