From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:49:41 +0100 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1rg-00CY1P-VG for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:49:40 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1rf-0004hc-TJ for lore@pengutronix.de; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:49:40 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=h0xqkea3dmhqxCPnMJTSqxE5CTa0dUr9SjT1lynCQyA=; b=WVPvCI0UIkhWOnpvknGxsS9Qg3 3iAFzzrle06K4tfQmFqZnnw5mLc2idvjFkvCYU9tKCUkHXhOEE+UrA4TTv09IPYMGmftMNqJbBXhy XS4BPt3CGXce1tqqxq/2vuwel7PD1U6Y1ojdDrH1G/1rqKkZ4MdOkJ181pVCT5sWGj7+iKuzCA3GK Cr1Mr2pGGuVib+koA0aJGb/CFC2O9J8NtM8ZIS1UUWYLYsDUdoiu35hrI98CAtrhDtAg1RX0+84e9 s6Fy8EZ7INy8zP+TDQeL+JeLzCbU59lwTSStCA3R+PuOtN2dAkepPAeLFmweo8xvVw4JkAYGzh9O8 j5gCib6g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pU1qL-003Npw-IF; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:48:17 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pU1qG-003Noz-C8 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:48:13 +0000 Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1qE-0004ZP-0t; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:48:10 +0100 Received: from mfe by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pU1qD-0001ze-Pa; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:48:09 +0100 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 09:48:09 +0100 From: Marco Felsch To: Ahmad Fatoum Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20230220084809.f7xcbqzwbz5jzsd6@pengutronix.de> References: <20230217173057.1839835-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230217173057.1839835-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230220_004812_535830_7884B037 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.88 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.ext.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/20] dts: avoid DT breakage new fancy DTC v1.7.0 syntax X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de) Hi Ahmad, On 23-02-17, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > The fresh v1.7.0 release of the device tree compiler now contains > fancy new syntax: > > &{i2c1/at24@50} { > partitions { > /* something */ > }; > }; > > instead of &{/soc/bus1/bus2/i2c@12345678/at24@50}, which is overly > verbose or &i2c1 { at24@50 }, which will break once someone renames > it upstream to please the schema checker. Just to double check this and I understood you correctly, the compiler will complain if we specify: &{i2c1/at24@50} { }; and the node is not exisitng anymore? Regards, Marco