Re: [PATCH] ARM: Rockchip: let boards depend on 32/64bit

[Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:59:56AM +0900, Masahiro YAMADA wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 11:09 PM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > So far we can enable support for 32bit and 64bit SoCs at the same time
> > which results in an unbuildable barebox. This is annoying, let the board
> > visibility depend on the selected code model.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> 
> 
> What is weird in the current approach is,
> none of "make ARCH=arm64 allnoconfig"
> "make ARCH=arm64 allyesconfig" sets CONFIG_64BIT.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I think CONFIG_64BIT should be the highest level option,
> which is not selected by anyone, and does not depend on
> any other CONFIG option.

Yes, I've also already realized there's something fishy with the way
32bit vs. 64bit is handled in our Kconfig options, I just didn't know
what to do about it.

Making CONFIG_64BIT the highest level option really seems to solve it
well. I'll send a patch for it shortly.

Thanks for noting and motivating ;)

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |