From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/34] ARM: mmu32: Skip reserved ranges during initialization
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:55:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230517145541.GD29365@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1caed1b5-108d-7686-4e3b-0fd3bab04a58@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 04:43:39PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 17.05.23 11:03, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > The early MMU code now uses pages to map the OP-TEE area non executable.
> > This mapping is overwritten with sections in barebox proper. Refrain
> > from doing so by using arch_remap_range() and bypassing reserved areas.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> > index 705d27a045..47711bed35 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_32.c
> > @@ -522,9 +522,17 @@ void __mmu_init(bool mmu_on)
> > vectors_init();
>
> Took me a while to parse the below code, so I think a comment may be apt:
That's just fair, it likely tool me even longer to write it ;)
>
> /*
> * Early mmu init will have mapped everything but the initial memory area
> * (excluding final OPTEE_SIZE bytes) uncached. We have now discovered
> * all memory banks, so let's map all pages, excluding reserved memory areas,
> * cacheable and executable.
> */
>
> >
> > for_each_memory_bank(bank) {
> > - create_sections(bank->start, bank->start + bank->size - 1,
> > - PMD_SECT_DEF_CACHED);
> > - __mmu_cache_flush();
> > + struct resource *rsv;
> > + resource_size_t pos;
> > +
> > + pos = bank->start;
> > +
> > + for_each_reserved_region(bank, rsv) {
> > + arch_remap_range((void *)pos, rsv->start - pos, MAP_CACHED);
> > + pos = rsv->end + 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + arch_remap_range((void *)pos, bank->start + bank->size - pos, MAP_CACHED);
>
> I am a bit bothered by the asymmetry here: Reserved regions in the extra memory banks
> will be initially uncached (because outside initmem), so this loop does the correct thing.
>
> For reserved regions within the initial memory, only the OP-TEE region would be uncached,
> everything else would just be requested, but is still mapped cacheable.
>
> IMO, that's surprising behavior.
I agree. What would you suggest. Map all reserved regions uncached?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-17 9:03 [PATCH v2 00/34] ARM: MMU rework Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] ARM: remove unused membase argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] ARM: remove unused define Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] ARM: rename __arm_mem_scratch to arm_mem_scratch Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:46 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] ARM: put scratch mem area below OP-TEE Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:48 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 13:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 15:50 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] ARM: add arm_mem_optee() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] ARM: make arm_mem_scratch() a static inline function Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] ARM: define stack base consistently Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] ARM: move arm_mem_scratch_get() lower for consistency Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 12:57 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] ARM: drop cache function initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] ARM: Add _32 suffix to aarch32 specific filenames Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] ARM: cpu.c: remove unused include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] ARM: mmu-common.c: use common mmu include Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] ARM: mmu32: rename mmu.h to mmu_32.h Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] ARM: mmu: implement MAP_FAULT Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] ARM: mmu64: Use arch_remap_range where possible Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] ARM: mmu32: implement zero_page_*() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] ARM: i.MX: Drop HAB workaround Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:01 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] ARM: Move early MMU after malloc initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] ARM: mmu: move dma_sync_single_for_device to extra file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] ARM: mmu: merge mmu-early_xx.c into mmu_xx.c Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] ARM: mmu: alloc 64k for early page tables Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] ARM: mmu32: create alloc_pte() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:07 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] ARM: mmu64: " Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 13:17 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] ARM: mmu: drop ttb argument Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:23 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] ARM: mmu: always do MMU initialization early when MMU is enabled Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:29 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] ARM: mmu32: Assume MMU is on Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] ARM: mmu32: Fix pmd_flags_to_pte() for ARMv4/5/6 Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:39 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] ARM: mmu32: Add pte_flags_to_pmd() Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:43 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] ARM: mmu32: add get_pte_flags, get_pmd_flags Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:46 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] ARM: mmu32: move functions into c file Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:48 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] ARM: mmu32: read TTB value from register Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 13:58 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:39 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-19 6:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-19 7:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-19 7:52 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] ARM: mmu32: Use pages for early MMU setup Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-22 8:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] ARM: mmu32: Skip reserved ranges during initialization Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:43 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 14:55 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2023-05-17 15:56 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-05-17 9:03 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] ARM: mmu64: Use two level pagetables in early code Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230517145541.GD29365@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox