From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, uol@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH master v1 5/6] ARM64: unset CONFIG_MISSING_FIRMWARE_ERROR for Rockchip/i.MX
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 08:33:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230703063314.vfp4lgig3wafxqjz@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626153335.3592017-6-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
On 23-06-26, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> barebox ARMv8 images for Rockchip and i.MX depend on external firmware
> for RAM setup (e.g. DDR PHY firmware) and on a BL31 binary to service
> secure monitor calls of the operating system (usually TF-A).
>
> Images without this firmware are not functional and the build warns
> about it, yet for development, it's more convenient to have the build
> not fail. This is especially useful for multi_v8_defconfig, which also
> builds the drivers Qemu Virt64 image and which requires no extra
> firmware.
IMHO most user just use the defconfig as base and so they never notice
the new CONFIG_MISSING_FIRMWARE_ERROR switch. Since you have added a
great mechanism to inform the user that a particular barebox-bin is
missing firmware-files I would tend to set this config to 'n'.
Regards,
Marco
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/configs/imx_v8_defconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v8_defconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/configs/rockchip_v8_defconfig | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v8_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v8_defconfig
> index 93b85ff5ea40..99d871bfb968 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v8_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v8_defconfig
> @@ -147,3 +147,4 @@ CONFIG_FS_FAT_WRITE=y
> CONFIG_FS_FAT_LFN=y
> CONFIG_FS_RATP=y
> CONFIG_ZLIB=y
> +# CONFIG_MISSING_FIRMWARE_ERROR is not set
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v8_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v8_defconfig
> index e0ff21641a01..76b80975887d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v8_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v8_defconfig
> @@ -241,3 +241,4 @@ CONFIG_FS_PSTORE=y
> CONFIG_FS_PSTORE_CONSOLE=y
> CONFIG_FS_RATP=y
> CONFIG_LZO_DECOMPRESS=y
> +# CONFIG_MISSING_FIRMWARE_ERROR is not set
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/rockchip_v8_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/rockchip_v8_defconfig
> index cc3c3c6d489b..7d1d41965ece 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/rockchip_v8_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/rockchip_v8_defconfig
> @@ -149,3 +149,4 @@ CONFIG_FS_FAT_LFN=y
> CONFIG_FS_BPKFS=y
> CONFIG_FS_UIMAGEFS=y
> CONFIG_LZO_DECOMPRESS=y
> +# CONFIG_MISSING_FIRMWARE_ERROR is not set
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 15:33 [PATCH master v1 0/6] firmware: optionally turn missing firmware errors into warnings Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH master v1 1/6] firmware: reference pointer alignment defined in <asm-generic/pointer.h> Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-29 8:57 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH master v1 2/6] firmware: turn missing firmware into linker error Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-29 9:07 ` Marco Felsch
2023-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH master v1 3/6] firmware: optionally turn missing firmware errors into warnings Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-03 6:25 ` Marco Felsch
2023-07-03 8:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH master v1 4/6] ARM: Rockchip: gracefully handle missing firmware Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH master v1 5/6] ARM64: unset CONFIG_MISSING_FIRMWARE_ERROR for Rockchip/i.MX Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-03 6:33 ` Marco Felsch [this message]
2023-07-03 8:46 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH master v1 6/6] firmware: don't hardcode firmware paths in srctree for existence check Ahmad Fatoum
2023-07-03 6:34 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230703063314.vfp4lgig3wafxqjz@pengutronix.de \
--to=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=uol@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox