mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error
@ 2024-01-03 10:13 Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 2/3] test: self: regulator: depend on REGULATOR_FIXED for test Ahmad Fatoum
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2024-01-03 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox; +Cc: Ahmad Fatoum

expect_success is meant for return values of functions that return
negative error codes and as such compares the first argument to be
zero or greater, which means PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO will treat NULL pointers as
valid all the same leading to NULL pointer dereferences should the test
fail instead of a descriptive error message. Fix this by translating
NULL pointer to -errno or -EFAULT if errno is unset.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 test/self/ramfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/self/ramfs.c b/test/self/ramfs.c
index bce396dc171e..1bc2b3b068f0 100644
--- a/test/self/ramfs.c
+++ b/test/self/ramfs.c
@@ -27,7 +27,16 @@ BSELFTEST_GLOBALS();
 	__cond; \
 })
 
+static inline int ptr_to_err(const void *ptr)
+{
+	if (ptr)
+		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(ptr);
+
+	return -errno ?: -EFAULT;
+}
+
 #define expect_success(ret, ...) __expect((ret), (ret) >= 0, __VA_ARGS__)
+#define expect_ptrok(ptr, ...) expect_success(ptr_to_err(ptr), __VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_fail(ret, ...) __expect((ret), (ret) < 0, __VA_ARGS__)
 
 static inline int get_file_count(int i)
@@ -101,7 +110,7 @@ static void test_ramfs(void)
 		}
 
 		dir = opendir(dname);
-		if (!expect_success(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dir), "opening parent directory"))
+		if (!expect_ptrok(dir, "opening parent directory"))
 			continue;
 
 		j = 0;
@@ -120,11 +129,11 @@ static void test_ramfs(void)
 	}
 
 	oldpwd = pushd(dname);
-	if (!expect_success(oldpwd != NULL ? 0 : -EINVAL, "pushd()"))
+	if (!expect_ptrok(oldpwd, "pushd()"))
 		goto out;;
 
 	dir = opendir(".");
-	if (!expect_success(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dir), "opening parent directory"))
+	if (!expect_ptrok(dir, "opening parent directory"))
 		goto out;
 
 	i = 1;
@@ -183,7 +192,7 @@ static void test_ramfs(void)
 		expect_success(ret, "write_file()");
 
 		buf = read_file("test/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/FILE", NULL);
-		if (expect_success(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(buf), "read_file()")) {
+		if (expect_ptrok(buf, "read_file()")) {
 			expect_success(memcmp(buf, ARRAY_AND_SIZE(hello)),
 				       "read_file() content");
 		}
-- 
2.39.2




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH master 2/3] test: self: regulator: depend on REGULATOR_FIXED for test
  2024-01-03 10:13 [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2024-01-03 10:13 ` Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 3/3] test: self: mmu: fix message on skipping tests Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 14:10 ` [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Sascha Hauer
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2024-01-03 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox; +Cc: Ahmad Fatoum

The regulator self test requires fixed regulator support, which itself
already requires REGULATOR && OFDEVICE, which we already depend on.

Therefore, just add REGULATOR_FIXED as dependency.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 test/self/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/self/Kconfig b/test/self/Kconfig
index ace01accda7e..6b9a4bf4a6e4 100644
--- a/test/self/Kconfig
+++ b/test/self/Kconfig
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ config SELFTEST_ENABLE_ALL
 	select SELFTEST_MMU if MMU
 	select SELFTEST_STRING
 	select SELFTEST_SETJMP if ARCH_HAS_SJLJ
-	select SELFTEST_REGULATOR if REGULATOR && OFDEVICE
+	select SELFTEST_REGULATOR if REGULATOR_FIXED
 	select SELFTEST_TEST_COMMAND if CMD_TEST
 	select SELFTEST_IDR
 	help
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ config SELFTEST_SETJMP
 
 config SELFTEST_REGULATOR
 	bool "Regulator selftest"
-	depends on REGULATOR && OFDEVICE
+	depends on REGULATOR_FIXED
 	select OF_OVERLAY
 
 config SELFTEST_TEST_COMMAND
-- 
2.39.2




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH master 3/3] test: self: mmu: fix message on skipping tests
  2024-01-03 10:13 [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 2/3] test: self: regulator: depend on REGULATOR_FIXED for test Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2024-01-03 10:13 ` Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 14:10 ` [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Sascha Hauer
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2024-01-03 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: barebox; +Cc: Ahmad Fatoum

The message currently reads:

  "skipping CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DATA_ABORT_MASK because test_zero_page=n\n"

when it should be the other way round. Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
 test/self/mmu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/self/mmu.c b/test/self/mmu.c
index 58961daaab95..dbe5004550a8 100644
--- a/test/self/mmu.c
+++ b/test/self/mmu.c
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static void test_zero_page(void)
 	total_tests += 3;
 
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DATA_ABORT_MASK)) {
-		pr_info("skipping %s because %s=n\n",
-			"CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DATA_ABORT_MASK", __func__);
+		pr_info("skipping %s because CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DATA_ABORT_MASK=n\n",
+			__func__);
 		skipped_tests += 3;
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error
  2024-01-03 10:13 [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 2/3] test: self: regulator: depend on REGULATOR_FIXED for test Ahmad Fatoum
  2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 3/3] test: self: mmu: fix message on skipping tests Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2024-01-03 14:10 ` Sascha Hauer
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2024-01-03 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ahmad Fatoum; +Cc: barebox

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> expect_success is meant for return values of functions that return
> negative error codes and as such compares the first argument to be
> zero or greater, which means PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO will treat NULL pointers as
> valid all the same leading to NULL pointer dereferences should the test
> fail instead of a descriptive error message. Fix this by translating
> NULL pointer to -errno or -EFAULT if errno is unset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  test/self/ramfs.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks

Sascha

> 
> diff --git a/test/self/ramfs.c b/test/self/ramfs.c
> index bce396dc171e..1bc2b3b068f0 100644
> --- a/test/self/ramfs.c
> +++ b/test/self/ramfs.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,16 @@ BSELFTEST_GLOBALS();
>  	__cond; \
>  })
>  
> +static inline int ptr_to_err(const void *ptr)
> +{
> +	if (ptr)
> +		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(ptr);
> +
> +	return -errno ?: -EFAULT;
> +}
> +
>  #define expect_success(ret, ...) __expect((ret), (ret) >= 0, __VA_ARGS__)
> +#define expect_ptrok(ptr, ...) expect_success(ptr_to_err(ptr), __VA_ARGS__)
>  #define expect_fail(ret, ...) __expect((ret), (ret) < 0, __VA_ARGS__)
>  
>  static inline int get_file_count(int i)
> @@ -101,7 +110,7 @@ static void test_ramfs(void)
>  		}
>  
>  		dir = opendir(dname);
> -		if (!expect_success(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dir), "opening parent directory"))
> +		if (!expect_ptrok(dir, "opening parent directory"))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		j = 0;
> @@ -120,11 +129,11 @@ static void test_ramfs(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	oldpwd = pushd(dname);
> -	if (!expect_success(oldpwd != NULL ? 0 : -EINVAL, "pushd()"))
> +	if (!expect_ptrok(oldpwd, "pushd()"))
>  		goto out;;
>  
>  	dir = opendir(".");
> -	if (!expect_success(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dir), "opening parent directory"))
> +	if (!expect_ptrok(dir, "opening parent directory"))
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	i = 1;
> @@ -183,7 +192,7 @@ static void test_ramfs(void)
>  		expect_success(ret, "write_file()");
>  
>  		buf = read_file("test/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/FILE", NULL);
> -		if (expect_success(PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(buf), "read_file()")) {
> +		if (expect_ptrok(buf, "read_file()")) {
>  			expect_success(memcmp(buf, ARRAY_AND_SIZE(hello)),
>  				       "read_file() content");
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-03 14:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-03 10:13 [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Ahmad Fatoum
2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 2/3] test: self: regulator: depend on REGULATOR_FIXED for test Ahmad Fatoum
2024-01-03 10:13 ` [PATCH master 3/3] test: self: mmu: fix message on skipping tests Ahmad Fatoum
2024-01-03 14:10 ` [PATCH master 1/3] test: self: ramfs: fix null pointer dereference on error Sascha Hauer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox