From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from relay1.ptmail.sapo.pt ([212.55.154.21] helo=sapo.pt) by merlin.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1V7UlE-0005ih-Ja for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:16:33 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO probook.localnet) (as3038625@sapo.pt@[83.240.187.74]) (envelope-sender ) by mta14 (qmail-ptmail-1.0.0) with SMTP for ; 8 Aug 2013 18:16:00 -0000 From: Cristiano Rodrigues Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:15:59 +0100 Message-ID: <2077419.7Hi1KuMiAA@probook> In-Reply-To: <8713898.T97Zsga2ps@probook> References: <1375980427.338104700@f146.i.mail.ru> <8713898.T97Zsga2ps@probook> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: barebox-2013.07/08.0 works from RAM but fails from NAND (Mini2440) To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi again :) The problem is solved. barebox 2013.08.0-00156-g72826e7-dirty -> boot from NAND without problem On Thursday 08 August 2013 17:11:28 Cristiano Rodrigues wrote > Thanks for trying to help :) > > here it is the git bisect log: > git bisect start > # bad: [1f3ac50f527932b4409cf4b3cf84f4be02a65be5] ARM: bootm: Print Kernel > commandline unconditionally > git bisect bad 1f3ac50f527932b4409cf4b3cf84f4be02a65be5 > # good: [2aca947c785bfc46bb5bce75ed1f69c285ac3f36] Release v2013.05.1 > git bisect good 2aca947c785bfc46bb5bce75ed1f69c285ac3f36 > # good: [5fdb9c0829b12e042e8fa1131bf2eee180e2b11b] Release v2013.05.0 > git bisect good 5fdb9c0829b12e042e8fa1131bf2eee180e2b11b > # bad: [5f56c3506007eea1a284cdc55f8b3e60de67f2cc] Merge branch 'for-next/of' > git bisect bad 5f56c3506007eea1a284cdc55f8b3e60de67f2cc > # bad: [cd07f67a300f7c938952c38d909a70d4bc45db57] arm: mvebu: remove useless > lines in kwbimage.cfg for CuBox > git bisect bad cd07f67a300f7c938952c38d909a70d4bc45db57 > # bad: [da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1] Merge branch > 'for-next/omap' git bisect bad da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1 > # good: [3cdd18632e72cbb8b0402df3e4821dfd7d24643b] Merge branch 'for- > next/memory-commands' > git bisect good 3cdd18632e72cbb8b0402df3e4821dfd7d24643b > # good: [c8af035b4176af0e8da2cdd2d10109b56e06444e] Merge branch 'for- > next/misc' > git bisect good c8af035b4176af0e8da2cdd2d10109b56e06444e > # good: [32dc070fd499a8a0bc4bc434fe74319c7463a97a] pinctrl: move > imx-iomux-v1 to drivers/pinctrl/ > git bisect good 32dc070fd499a8a0bc4bc434fe74319c7463a97a > # good: [579b794b5d13e4a1ffa21d2426bfab7050eaba9d] Merge branch > 'for-next/of' git bisect good 579b794b5d13e4a1ffa21d2426bfab7050eaba9d > # good: [a6fda1886a40ecf89573ec53c3abae87fe59bba7] beaglebone: remove stray > semicolon > git bisect good a6fda1886a40ecf89573ec53c3abae87fe59bba7 > # good: [98839ca886a1e146091e06799cde6c9912f77863] m33xx-clock: configure > PLLs based on oscillator frequency > git bisect good 98839ca886a1e146091e06799cde6c9912f77863 > # good: [de5b9f71bf8d3afbe9503b98acef9a93f1e08881] m33xx-clock: remove > unused code > git bisect good de5b9f71bf8d3afbe9503b98acef9a93f1e08881 > # first bad commit: [da1ada40d27c734ec51f1da924b2ecbbd28115c1] Merge branch > 'for-next/omap' > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:47:07 you wrote: > > > 64MB of SDRAM > > > > No, seems it is other problem. > > So, I cannot say more here. Just try to retry git bisect > > with bad v2013.06.0 and good v2013.05.0 (yes 5.0, not 5.1). > > So, as first do: > > git bisect reset > > then > > git bisect start > > git bisect good v2013.05.0 > > git bisect bad v2013.06.0 > > and mark commits (in proper state) as in previous case. > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:36:23 you wrote: > > > > > v2013.05.0 ->good > > > > > v2013.05.1 ->good > > > > > v2013.06.0 ->bad > > > > > > > > Ok. I suspect one thing, but as first tell me size of SDRAM on your > > > > borad. > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:31:45 you wrote: > > > > > > > you are right. the patch is only for i.MX and is older than > > > > > > > 2013.05 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm checking again > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 20:24:57 Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 18:52:47 Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/8/8 Pawel Suchanecki : > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear list & developers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My barebox works (I get barebox prompt and can boot > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > there) > > > > > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > loaded > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi there :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is the first commit after the barebox version 2013.05.1 > > > > > > > > > that is > > > > > > > > > breaking > > > > > > > > > the mini2440 NAND boot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cris@ProBook:~/mini2440/Boot/barebox_git$ git bisect bad > > > > > > > > > 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3 is the first bad > > > > > > > > > commit > > > > > > > > > commit 5f82a0cd0138ae5208cc8758c638ce6a928ed2e3 > > > > > > > > > Author: Alexander Shiyan > > > > > > > > > Date: Tue Apr 9 19:05:31 2013 +0400 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ARM: cpuimx51: Use custom padctrl for fec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The fec padctrl is different from what we have in the > > > > > > > > > kernel > > > > > > > > > iomux > > > > > > > > > file. To be able to keep the iomux file in sync with the > > > > > > > > > kernel, > > > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > a custom padctrl for the cpuimx51 board. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems something incorrect since patch is touched i.MX arch > > > > > > > > only. > > > > > > > > > > > > Which exact barebox version is known as good and bad? > > > > > > Can you try all? (v2013.05.0, v2013.05.1,v2013.06.0 etc...) > > > > --- > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox