From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OUEXe-0000gM-7P for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:50:38 +0000 Message-ID: <4C2C48CB.50403@eukrea.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:50:35 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100701071307.GG16981@jasper.tkos.co.il> <4C2C4396.1060702@eukrea.com> <20100701074739.GB12115@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20100701074739.GB12115@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; Format="flowed" Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Barebox 'git describe' strangeness To: Sascha Hauer Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" Le 01/07/2010 09:47, Sascha Hauer a =E9crit : > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:28:22AM +0200, Eric B=E9nard wrote: >> same thing here (the man says "By default (without --all or --tags) git >> describe only shows annotated tags." so maybe the tags after 2009.12.0 >> are not annotated ?) > > No, they are not. Sorry, I'm still learning git... > so we are all learning git ;-) Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox