From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org>
Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49])
	by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1OfEZ8-0007my-75
	for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:05:39 +0000
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so1097994ewy.36
	for <barebox@lists.infradead.org>; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C5449CD.8000203@dawes.za.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:05:33 +0200
From: Rogan Dawes <rogan@dawes.za.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4C532D05.7020407@dawes.za.net> <4C540747.7000602@dawes.za.net>
	<4C5418BF.3000301@eukrea.com> <4C543F3A.1040709@dawes.za.net>
	<4C54460D.1050804@eukrea.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C54460D.1050804@eukrea.com>
List-Id: <barebox.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/barebox>,
	<mailto:barebox-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/>
List-Post: <mailto:barebox@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:barebox-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox>,
	<mailto:barebox-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Porting to Marvell 88F5182?
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= <eric@eukrea.com>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>

On 2010/07/31 5:49 PM, Eric B=E9nard wrote:
> Le 31/07/2010 17:20, Rogan Dawes a =E9crit :
>> Ok, that makes sense, I guess. So the bare minimum I absolutely have to
>> do is set up the serial port.
>>
> and also memory mapping + timer

Ok.

>> But won't the second stage loader simply use the existing memory map? I
>> suppose I could tell it what it actually is, if it can't figure it out.
>> I'm a little surprised it doesn't "just work", because I am currently
>> booting using an old U-boot, chaining to a newly compiled U-Boot, and it
>> "just works" (apart from the flash).
>>
> yes but the new u-boot has all the necessary low level access for your
> hardware !

Well, the new U-Boot also skips the lowlevel init code, so . . .

What that actually means in practice, I'm not 100% sure.

Regards,

Rogan

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox