From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.coresystems.de ([80.81.252.135]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OqREY-0004rK-Tc for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:50:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4C7D08A3.8000505@coresystems.de> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:50:27 +0200 From: Stefan Reinauer MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C7CD898.9040902@coresystems.de> <20100831131817.GA1883@game.jcrosoft.org> In-Reply-To: <20100831131817.GA1883@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: barebox on x86 To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Jean-Christophe, On 8/31/10 3:18 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > why do you touch it? Sorry, touch _what_ in particular? > barebox is self content so I do not understand why you do such modificaton > specially uf we are supposed to do crosscompile > Unfortunately that assumption is wrong, at least for the x86 target. Almost all my patch does is trying to fix exactly that (along with dropping the requirement to use Linux on the host side) And, yes, I am using an i386-elf- cross compiler. Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox