From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.tibbo.com ([81.171.42.199]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q1kly-00089v-4t for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:28:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4D87A53A.1060903@tibbo.com> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:21:30 +0300 From: Dvorkin Dmitry MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D80C8AB.4040905@nextfour.com> <4D81D20E.3060803@eukrea.com> <4D8711C3.7050107@nextfour.com> In-Reply-To: <4D8711C3.7050107@nextfour.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Atmel status To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Dear developers! what is the status of the barebox for Atmel? Anyone tested it with any SAM* devkits? I see a big potential of barebox, I like it's structure and design and I'm interested in sam9m10g45ek support. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox