* Using barebox-state as library
@ 2021-02-10 8:37 barebox+mailing
2021-02-10 8:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: barebox+mailing @ 2021-02-10 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Hey everyone,
I would like to set and read barebox-states during runtime. Unfortunately only a binary is available to be used.
But because the variable names and values are from an untrusted environment, I don't like them to be passed to a shell directly.
Therefore I would like to use a barebox-state library, which offers some functions, e.g. read_var, set_var, ...
An other approach would be some kind of IPC, e.g. dbus or similar, but I'm not sure if that would fit into the simplicity of the current binary.
Do you see any other possibilities so fetch and set variables from the barebox-state?
Greetings,
Marcel
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Using barebox-state as library
2021-02-10 8:37 Using barebox-state as library barebox+mailing
@ 2021-02-10 8:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2021-02-10 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox+mailing, barebox
Hello Marcel,
On 10.02.21 09:37, barebox+mailing@cookiesoft.de wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I would like to set and read barebox-states during runtime. Unfortunately only a binary is available to be used.
> But because the variable names and values are from an untrusted environment, I don't like them to be passed to a shell directly.
I can't follow here. Why can't you run barebox-state with the required arguments? That's what e.g.
RAUC is doing. It can listen on DBus for e.g. a mark-good and then calls barebox-state with the correct
arguments. You can use standard Linux access control mechanisms, so only your daemon's group may use
barebox-state.
> Therefore I would like to use a barebox-state library, which offers some functions, e.g. read_var, set_var, ...
dt-utils and barebox-sate is GPL2-licensed, so if that's acceptable for your daemon, you could
take dt-utils:src/barebox-state.c and replace the argument parsing with whatever. I am not
aware whether someone did that before though.
> An other approach would be some kind of IPC, e.g. dbus or similar, but I'm not sure if that would fit into the simplicity of the current binary.
>
> Do you see any other possibilities so fetch and set variables from the barebox-state?
> Greetings,
> Marcel
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-10 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-10 8:37 Using barebox-state as library barebox+mailing
2021-02-10 8:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox