From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from exprod5og117.obsmtp.com ([64.18.0.149]) by merlin.infradead.org with smtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TF6eo-000342-0P for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:04:50 +0000 Message-ID: <505C9E29.708@ge.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:04:41 +0100 From: Renaud Barbier MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1348158669-14034-1-git-send-email-renaud.barbier@ge.com> <1348158669-14034-2-git-send-email-renaud.barbier@ge.com> <20120920182332.GD26553@game.jcrosoft.org> <20120921063408.GC1322@pengutronix.de> <20120921080658.GL26553@game.jcrosoft.org> <20120921083034.GE1322@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120921083034.GE1322@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] phylib: bus reset function To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 21/09/12 09:30, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:06:58AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 08:34 Fri 21 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:23:32PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >>>> On 17:31 Thu 20 Sep , Renaud Barbier wrote: >>>>> Added an entry point for a bus reset function. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Renaud Barbier >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 3 +++ >>>>> include/miidev.h | 1 + >>>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c >>>>> index 5406ea3..d9f5409 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c >>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,9 @@ int phy_device_connect(struct eth_device *edev, struct mii_device *bus, int addr >>>>> unsigned int i; >>>>> int ret = -EINVAL; >>>>> >>>>> + if (bus->reset) >>>>> + bus->reset(bus); >>>>> + >>>> I do not like this we should not touch the bus at phy connect >>> >>> Then please make a suggestion where it should be then. I also have some >>> drivers where this function could be used. >> I have too the need of a reset >> >> I get a big issue on reset the mii bus at eth open >> >> my only idea was to move the phy detect awqy from the eth_open to the mii bus >> probe >> >> but this will increase the boot time as we do not need to probe the phy if we >> do not use the network > > Before we start adding quirks for do-the-reset-only-when necessary, > access-the-phy-pnly-when necessary can we have a statement on which > timescales we talk about here? A quick test on a i.MX board shows that > detecting the phy takes 186us when its address is specified and 1.7ms > when the whole bus is scanned for phys. This is really not worth adding > quirks for. > > BTW the reset function for the mii *bus* really should be done when the > bus is registered. Doing it when a new phy is registered will break phys > already present. In summary, we agree that we need a bus reset function and that it should be called at present by the function mii_register. > > Sascha > _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox