From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XWGP8-0006Ps-Db for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:04:38 +0000 Message-ID: <5420E2D9.9000006@atmel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:49 +0800 From: Bo Shen MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1410949295-30296-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <1410949295-30296-8-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <20140918061028.GY4992@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20140918061028.GY4992@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] ARM: at91: add sama5d4 soc support #1 To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Sascha, On 09/18/2014 02:10 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:21:33PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen >> --- >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9_smc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9_smc.c >> index 9f02807..5df7109 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9_smc.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9_smc.c >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ >> >> #define AT91_SAM9_SMC_CS_STRIDE 0x10 >> #define AT91_SAMA5_SMC_CS_STRIDE 0x14 >> -#define AT91_SMC_CS_STRIDE ((at91_soc_initdata.type == AT91_SOC_SAMA5D3) ? AT91_SAMA5_SMC_CS_STRIDE : AT91_SAM9_SMC_CS_STRIDE) >> +#define AT91_SMC_CS_STRIDE ((at91_soc_initdata.type == AT91_SOC_SAMA5D3 || at91_soc_initdata.type == AT91_SOC_SAMA5D4) ? AT91_SAMA5_SMC_CS_STRIDE : AT91_SAM9_SMC_CS_STRIDE) > > I'm no fan of the 80 character limit, too, but this is really too long > ;) Use multi-line format, would it be acceptable? > Sascha > > Best Regards, Bo Shen _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox