From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on next (Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove)
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 08:44:13 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5548AD0D.2040008@vanguardiasur.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504062919.GF6325@pengutronix.de>
On 05/04/2015 03:29 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
>
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> Hi Sascha,
>>
>> On 03/17/2015 03:25 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> In devices_shutdown we should call the busses remove function
>>> which in turn calls the drivers remove function. Otherwise for
>>> example PCI devices never get removed since they do not have
>>> a remove function but a pcidev->remove function instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/base/driver.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
>>> index 453966b..590c97c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
>>> @@ -399,8 +399,8 @@ void devices_shutdown(void)
>>> struct device_d *dev;
>>>
>>> list_for_each_entry(dev, &active, active) {
>>> - if (dev->driver->remove)
>>> - dev->driver->remove(dev);
>>> + if (dev->bus->remove)
>>> + dev->bus->remove(dev);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This commit caused a regression on the Openblocks A6 board, which now freezes
>> when calling devices_shutdown. The problem is that calling bus->remove makes
>> the remove() of the PHY driver called twice.
>>
>> This happened because the mdio bus device (mdio-mvebu) was registered first,
>> and the phy0 device was be registered later, and attached to the mdio bus.
>>
>> Upon device shutdown, when iterating through the active device list,
>> the phy0 device is removed before mdio-mvebu. Then, when the mdio bus device
>> is removed, the phy0 device is removed again, here:
>>
>> mdio_bus_remove(on mdio-mvebu)
>> mvebu_mdio_remove
>> mdiobus_unregister
>> unregister_device
>> mdio_bus_remove(on phy0)
>>
>> This is currently the case for the Kirkwood Openblocks A6 board, where a double
>> free(dev->cdev.name) in mdio_bus_remove causes a silent freeze when booting
>> Linux.
>
> Too bad that happened. I believe the following fixes this, but I have no
> hardware to test this on. Could you give this a test? I'll delay the
> outstanding release until this is solved.
>
> Sascha
>
> ----------------------------8<---------------------------
>
> From 15422e3435b0151f1b5d753b19a8578210da9d04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 08:16:20 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] net: phy: Do not double remove phy device
>
> This fixes: 80264a8 driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove
>
> On mvebu it happens that:
>
> Upon device shutdown, when iterating through the active device list,
> the phy0 device is removed before mdio-mvebu. Then, when the mdio bus
> device is removed, the phy0 device is removed again, here:
>
> mdio_bus_remove(on mdio-mvebu)
> mvebu_mdio_remove
> mdiobus_unregister
> unregister_device
> mdio_bus_remove(on phy0)
>
> Fix this by setting the mdio busses phy_map[phy->addr] to NULL when
> unregistering the phy device, so that mdiobus_unregister no longer
> finds a valid phy_device when iterating over the busses device list.
>
> Reported-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Thanks for the quick fix,
--
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 6:25 [PATCH 1/3] driver: fix device remove order Sascha Hauer
2015-03-17 6:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] driver: Call remove function only when available Sascha Hauer
2015-03-17 6:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove Sascha Hauer
2015-05-02 16:50 ` Regression on next (Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver: Call bus->remove instead of driver->remove) Ezequiel Garcia
2015-05-04 6:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-05 11:44 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5548AD0D.2040008@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--to=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox