From: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
"barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: rockchip: Add timer driver
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:59:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57A1966F.5040404@phytec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803054721.GJ20657@pengutronix.de>
On 03.08.2016 07:47, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:55:39PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote:
>>
>> On 20.07.2016 19:35, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de> wrote:
>>>> This driver comes from the u-boot (v2016.01).
>>> I'd suggest this to be moved to "drivers/clocksource" and converted to
>>> a proper driver that binds against DT node and doesn't use a CONFIG_*
>>> symbol to determine its base address.
>> I want to use this driver in the SPL part later. The SRAM we can use is
>> very limited on the RK3288. So I don't want to add more DT code here.
> Do we need a full barebox as SPL? This usually means we have to build
> barebox twice which is not very convenient. Can we instead build the SPL
> code into the barebox PBL? This is what I have done for i.MX.
>
> Sascha
No, we don't need a full barebox as SPL. It should be possible to build
barebox and the SPL part with one build.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 14:17 [PATCH 1/8] ARM: rockchip: Add basic RK3288 support Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: rockchip: Add timer driver Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 17:35 ` Andrey Smirnov
2016-07-28 11:55 ` Wadim Egorov
2016-07-28 19:12 ` Andrey Smirnov
2016-08-03 5:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-08-03 6:59 ` Wadim Egorov [this message]
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: rockchip: Add early debug support for RK3288 Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 15:03 ` Andrey Smirnov
2016-07-28 11:52 ` Wadim Egorov
2016-07-28 18:55 ` Andrey Smirnov
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] clk: Add RK3288 clock driver Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] mci: dw_mmc: Add RK3288 compatible string Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: Add phyCORE-RK3288 SOM support Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 17:57 ` Andrey Smirnov
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] configs: Add RK3288 defconfig Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 14:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] doc: Add RK3288 Documentation Wadim Egorov
2016-07-21 7:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-07-21 7:09 ` Wadim Egorov
2016-07-20 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: rockchip: Add basic RK3288 support Andrey Smirnov
2016-07-21 6:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-07-28 11:59 ` Wadim Egorov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57A1966F.5040404@phytec.de \
--to=w.egorov@phytec.de \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox