mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gianluca <gianlucarenzi@eurek.it>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "gianlucarenzi@eurek.it" <gianlucarenzi@eurek.it>
Subject: STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:07:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73e974ac-11a7-6ee7-ee1a-d5fab51e3b2f@eurek.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_PvuYsX9jMjjS8tmbOO52397dMw-xegh54aUm2hU2wTUGJqw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello list!

I need a __very quick__ answer to this subject, because a customer wants 
to migrate from a iMX28 based board to a STM32MP1.

Actually the iMX28 board was developed by me, 6 years ago and it has 
Barebox 2013.02, Linux Kernel 3.12.1 and a Debian Wheezy. It runs from 
eMMC, but it can boot from microSD for production line.

I modified Barebox with custom made init scripts to enable some i2c 
hardware before running Linux kernel, and Barebox had access/drivers for 
ethernet, serial for debugging console, i2c (bit-banging) and some gpios.

It had access to ext4 filesystem on eMMC partition and managed somehow 
the device tree to pass to Linux and it works like charms!

Now I would like to know (without spending too much time to gitclone the 
repo and reading the configuration stuff) if Barebox is still able to 
boot off a microSD, and having the same drivers available as the iMX28 
has, just to reduce the porting session at their minimum levels.

P.S.: I know UBoot for the evaluation board has all stuff I need, but I 
hate the way it works: too messy, too #ifdef clauses, etc.,...

Thank you in advance,
-- 
Eurek s.r.l.                          |
Electronic Engineering                | http://www.eurek.it
via Celletta 8/B, 40026 Imola, Italy  | Phone: +39-(0)542-609120
p.iva 00690621206 - c.f. 04020030377  | Fax:   +39-(0)542-609212

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-20  4:57 selected processor does not support `rev r7,r7' Lewis Zhou
2019-03-20  7:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-03-21  1:03   ` Lewis Zhou
2019-03-21  7:33     ` Sascha Hauer
2019-03-21  7:53       ` Lewis Zhou
2019-03-21  8:06         ` Sascha Hauer
     [not found]           ` <CAD_PvuY8oVy3Ny65bcF2a3LPC0R4+8uXCu6qda6CcbY+Ji+3JQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <CAPWKHJSLmc1+-rV0rZeGn37uhkWwKsqmWXZSGJAs32zLE=Hxtg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-21  8:49               ` Lewis Zhou
2019-03-21  9:25         ` Juergen Borleis
2019-03-22  1:02           ` Lewis Zhou
2019-03-22  8:07             ` gianluca [this message]
2019-03-22  9:31               ` STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox gianluca
2019-12-25  8:32                 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-03-22  9:46               ` Yann Sionneau
2019-03-22 11:24                 ` Robert Schwebel
2019-03-22  1:22           ` selected processor does not support `rev r7,r7' Lewis Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73e974ac-11a7-6ee7-ee1a-d5fab51e3b2f@eurek.it \
    --to=gianlucarenzi@eurek.it \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox