From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] common: add initial barebox deep-probe support
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <748eb0a5-a5ac-7be2-d909-f3af184db38d@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200928155041.32649-16-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
On 9/28/20 5:50 PM, Marco Felsch wrote:
> The barebox 'deep probe' or 'probe on demand' mechanism is the answer of
> unwanted -EPROBE_DEFER failures. The EPROBE_DEFER error code was
> introduced by commit ab3da15bc14c ("base: Introduce deferred probing")
> and since then it causes a few problems.
>
> The error is returned if either the device is not yet present or the
> driver is not yet registered. This makes sense on linux systems where
> modules and hot-plug devices are used very often but not for barebox.
> The module support is rarely used and devices aren't hot pluggable.
>
> The current barebox behaviour populates all devices before the drivers
> are registered so all devices are present during the driver
> registration. So the driver probe() function gets called immediately
> after the driver registration and causes the -EPROBE_DEFER error if this
> driver depends on an other not yet registered driver.
>
> To get rid of the EPROBE_DEFER error code we need to reorder the device
> population and the driver registration. All drivers must be registered
> first. In an ideal world all driver can be registered by the same
> initcall level. Then devices are getting populated which causes calling
> the driver probe() function but this time resources/devices are created
> on demand if not yet available.
>
> Dependencies between devices are normally expressed as references to
> other device nodes. With deep probe barebox provides helper functions
> which take a device node and probe the device behind that node if
> necessary. This means instead of returning -EPROBE_DEFER, we can now
> make the desired resources available once we need them.
>
> If the resource can't be created we are returning -ENODEV since we are
> not supporting hot-plugging. Dropping EPROBE_DEFER is the long-term
> goal, avoid initcall shifting is the short-term goal.
>
> Call it deep-probe since the on-demand device creation can greate very
> deep stacks. This commit adds the initial support for: spi, i2c, reset,
> regulator and clk resource on-demand creation. The deep-probe mechanism
> must be enabled for each board to avoid breaking changes using
> deep_probe_enable(). This can be changed later after all boards are
> converted to the new mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> common/Makefile | 1 +
> common/deep-probe.c | 39 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/base/driver.c | 11 ++++-
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 ++
> drivers/i2c/i2c.c | 6 +++
> drivers/of/base.c | 13 ++++-
> drivers/of/platform.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 6 +++
> drivers/reset/core.c | 5 ++
> drivers/spi/spi.c | 2 +
> include/deep-probe.h | 17 +++++++
> include/of.h | 37 +++++++++++++-
> 12 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 common/deep-probe.c
> create mode 100644 include/deep-probe.h
>
> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile
> index c3ae3ca1b9..8525240422 100644
> --- a/common/Makefile
> +++ b/common/Makefile
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-y += memory_display.o
> pbl-$(CONFIG_PBL_CONSOLE) += memory_display.o
> obj-y += clock.o
> obj-y += console_common.o
> +obj-y += deep-probe.o
> obj-y += startup.o
> obj-y += misc.o
> obj-pbl-y += memsize.o
> diff --git a/common/deep-probe.c b/common/deep-probe.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..05ce4352b1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/common/deep-probe.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <deep-probe.h>
Shouldn't this rather be under drivers/of/ ?
maybe also name it something starting with of_ ?
> +#include <of.h>
> +
> +struct deep_probe_entry {
> + struct list_head entry;
> + const char *compatible;
> +};
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(boards);
> +
> +int deep_probe_add_board(const char *machine)
> +{
> + struct deep_probe_entry *new_machine;
> +
> + new_machine = xzalloc(sizeof(*new_machine));
> + if (!new_machine)
> + return -ENOMEM;
xzalloc can't fail.
> +
> + new_machine->compatible = machine;
> + list_add(&new_machine->entry, &boards);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(deep_probe_add_board);
> +
> +bool deep_probe_is_supported(void)
> +{
> + struct deep_probe_entry *machine;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(machine, &boards, entry) {
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible(machine->compatible))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(deep_probe_is_supported);
> diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
> index 412db6c406..b797655c15 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>
> #include <common.h>
> #include <command.h>
> +#include <deep-probe.h>
> #include <driver.h>
> #include <malloc.h>
> #include <console.h>
> @@ -95,7 +96,15 @@ int device_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> list_del(&dev->active);
> list_add(&dev->active, &deferred);
> - dev_dbg(dev, "probe deferred\n");
> +
> + /*
> + * -EPROBE_DEFER should never appear on a deep-probe machine so
> + * inform the user immediately.
> + */
> + if (deep_probe_is_supported())
> + dev_warn(dev, "probe deferred\n");
> + else
> + dev_dbg(dev, "probe deferred\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index b04d44593b..218317d00d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -437,9 +437,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_clk_del_provider);
>
> struct clk *of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec)
> {
> + struct device_d *dev;
> struct of_clk_provider *provider;
> struct clk *clk = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>
> + dev = of_device_create_on_demand(clkspec->np);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev))
> + return ERR_CAST(dev);
> +
> /* Check if we have such a provider in our array */
> list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_clk_providers, link) {
> if (provider->node == clkspec->np)
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c.c
> index 57d8c7017f..dbc0bd4f0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> return NULL;
> }
> client->dev.info = i2c_info;
> + chip->of_node->dev = &client->dev;
Are you sure, you can always assume of_node != NULL here?
>
> return client;
> }
> @@ -547,8 +548,13 @@ struct i2c_adapter *i2c_get_adapter(int busnum)
>
> struct i2c_adapter *of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(struct device_node *node)
> {
> + struct device_d *dev;
> struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>
> + dev = of_device_create_on_demand(node);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev))
> + return ERR_CAST(dev);
> +
> for_each_i2c_adapter(adap)
> if (adap->dev.device_node == node)
> return adap;
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 861871b221..cea6d5b1aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> * GNU General Public License for more details.
> */
> #include <common.h>
> +#include <deep-probe.h>
> #include <of.h>
> #include <of_address.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> @@ -1567,6 +1568,15 @@ int of_set_root_node(struct device_node *node)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int barebox_of_populate(void)
> +{
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFDEVICE) && deep_probe_is_supported())
> + of_probe();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +of_populate_initcall(barebox_of_populate);
> +
> void barebox_register_of(struct device_node *root)
> {
> if (root_node)
> @@ -1577,7 +1587,8 @@ void barebox_register_of(struct device_node *root)
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFDEVICE)) {
> of_clk_init(root, NULL);
> - of_probe();
> + if (!deep_probe_is_supported())
> + of_probe();
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 21c7cce1a5..c837adf8e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> * GNU General Public License for more details.
> */
> #include <common.h>
> +#include <deep-probe.h>
> #include <malloc.h>
> #include <of.h>
> #include <of_address.h>
> @@ -29,6 +30,11 @@
> struct device_d *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device_d *dev;
> +
> + dev = of_device_create_on_demand(np);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev))
> + return NULL;
> +
> for_each_device(dev)
> if (dev->device_node == np)
> return dev;
> @@ -106,6 +112,9 @@ struct device_d *of_platform_device_create(struct device_node *np,
> if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> return NULL;
>
> + if (np->dev)
> + return np->dev;
> +
Unsure if this is correct. Seek down to the "check if all address resources match" comment.
It's possible that devices are registered multiple times and are coalesced later on.
I can't say for sure though, where we are doing this at the moment.
> /* count the io resources */
> if (of_can_translate_address(np))
> while (of_address_to_resource(np, num_reg, &temp_res) == 0)
> @@ -170,8 +179,10 @@ struct device_d *of_platform_device_create(struct device_node *np,
> (num_reg) ? &dev->resource[0].start : &resinval);
>
> ret = platform_device_register(dev);
> - if (!ret)
> + if (!ret) {
> + np->dev = dev;
> return dev;
> + }
>
> free(dev);
> if (num_reg)
> @@ -252,6 +263,9 @@ static struct device_d *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *np)
> if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> return NULL;
>
> + if (np->dev)
> + return np->dev;
> +
> dev = xzalloc(sizeof(*dev));
>
> /* setup generic device info */
> @@ -275,6 +289,8 @@ static struct device_d *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *np)
> if (ret)
> goto amba_err_free;
>
> + np->dev = &dev->dev;
> +
> return &dev->dev;
>
> amba_err_free:
> @@ -364,3 +380,86 @@ int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root,
> return rc;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_platform_populate);
> +
> +struct device_d *of_device_create_on_demand(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct device_node *parent;
> + struct device_d *parent_dev, *dev;
> +
> + if (!deep_probe_is_supported())
> + return NULL;
> +
> + parent = of_get_parent(np);
> + if (!parent)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Create all parent devices needed for the requested device */
> + parent_dev = parent->dev ? : of_device_create_on_demand(parent);
> + if (IS_ERR(parent_dev))
> + return parent_dev;
> +
> + /*
> + * Parent devices like i2c/spi controllers are populating their own
> + * devices. So it can be that the requested device already exist after
> + * the parent device creation.
> + */
> + if (np->dev)
> + return np->dev;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: Create %s (%s) on demand\n", __func__,
> + np->name, np->full_name);
> +
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "arm,primecell"))
> + dev = of_amba_device_create(np);
> + else
> + dev = of_platform_device_create(np, parent_dev);
> +
> + return dev ? : ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_device_create_on_demand);
> +
> +struct device_d *of_device_create_on_demand_by_alias(const char *alias)
> +{
> + struct device_node *dev_node;
> +
> + dev_node = of_find_node_by_alias(NULL, alias);
> + return of_device_create_on_demand(dev_node);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_device_create_on_demand_by_alias);
> +
> +struct device_d *
> +of_device_create_on_demand_by_dev_id(struct device_node *np,
> + const struct of_device_id *ids)
> +{
I find it surprising that this works recursively, while the previous
by_alias doesn't
> + struct device_node *child;
> +
> + if (of_match_node(ids, np))
> + return of_device_create_on_demand(np);
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + struct device_d *dev;
> +
> + dev = of_device_create_on_demand_by_dev_id(child, ids);
> + if (!IS_ERR(dev))
> + return dev;
> + }
> +
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_device_create_on_demand_by_dev_id);
> +
> +int of_devices_create_on_demand_by_property(const char *property_name)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> +
> + for_each_node_with_property(node, property_name) {
> + struct device_d *dev;
> +
> + dev = of_device_create_on_demand(node);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev))
> + return PTR_ERR(dev);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_devices_create_on_demand_by_property);
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 6ea21a4609..25973acaf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ int of_regulator_register(struct regulator_dev *rd, struct device_node *node)
> return PTR_ERR(ri);
>
> ri->node = node;
> + node->dev = rd->dev;
>
> of_property_read_u32(node, "regulator-enable-ramp-delay",
> &ri->enable_time_us);
> @@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ int of_regulator_register(struct regulator_dev *rd, struct device_node *node)
>
> static struct regulator_internal *of_regulator_get(struct device_d *dev, const char *supply)
> {
> + struct device_d *dev_ondemand;
> char *propname;
> struct regulator_internal *ri;
> struct device_node *node;
> @@ -222,6 +224,10 @@ static struct regulator_internal *of_regulator_get(struct device_d *dev, const c
> goto out;
> }
>
> + dev_ondemand = of_device_create_on_demand(node);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev_ondemand))
> + return ERR_CAST(dev_ondemand);
> +
> list_for_each_entry(ri, ®ulator_list, list) {
> if (ri->node == node) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "Using %s regulator from %s\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 99b9c80655..874de11b0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ static struct reset_control *of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node,
> struct reset_control *rstc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> struct reset_controller_dev *r, *rcdev;
> struct of_phandle_args args;
> + struct device_d *dev;
> int index = 0;
> int rstc_id;
> int ret;
> @@ -168,6 +169,10 @@ static struct reset_control *of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node,
> if (ret)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> + dev = of_device_create_on_demand(args.np);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev))
> + return ERR_CAST(dev);
> +
> rcdev = NULL;
> list_for_each_entry(r, &reset_controller_list, list) {
> if (args.np == r->of_node) {
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index 8421d9d7c1..d1d3bdcc41 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ struct spi_device *spi_new_device(struct spi_controller *ctrl,
> if (status)
> goto fail;
>
> + chip->device_node->dev = &proxy->dev;
> +
> return proxy;
> fail:
> free(proxy);
> diff --git a/include/deep-probe.h b/include/deep-probe.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..f9a1f61fde
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/deep-probe.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#ifndef __DEEP_PROBE_H
> +#define __DEEP_PROBE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +int deep_probe_add_board(const char *machine);
> +bool deep_probe_is_supported(void);
> +
> +#define deep_probe_enable(func,board) \
> + static int __init func##_deep_probe_register(void) \
> + { \
> + return deep_probe_add_board(board); \
> + } \
> + pure_initcall(func##_deep_probe_register)
> +
> +#endif /* __DEEP_PROBE_H */
> diff --git a/include/of.h b/include/of.h
> index 1b3ceaff40..0f8d6f7546 100644
> --- a/include/of.h
> +++ b/include/of.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct device_node {
> struct list_head parent_list;
> struct list_head list;
> phandle phandle;
> + struct device_d *dev;
> };
>
> struct of_device_id {
> @@ -266,6 +267,13 @@ extern struct device_d *of_device_enable_and_register_by_name(const char *name);
> extern struct device_d *of_device_enable_and_register_by_alias(
> const char *alias);
>
> +extern struct device_d *of_device_create_on_demand(struct device_node *np);
> +extern struct device_d *of_device_create_on_demand_by_alias(const char *alias);
> +extern struct device_d *
> +of_device_create_on_demand_by_dev_id(struct device_node *np,
> + const struct of_device_id *ids);
> +extern int of_devices_create_on_demand_by_property(const char *property_name);
> +
> struct cdev *of_parse_partition(struct cdev *cdev, struct device_node *node);
> int of_parse_partitions(struct cdev *cdev, struct device_node *node);
> int of_partitions_register_fixup(struct cdev *cdev);
> @@ -331,12 +339,37 @@ static inline int of_set_root_node(struct device_node *node)
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
>
> -static inline struct device_d *of_platform_device_create(struct device_node *np,
> - struct device_d *parent)
> +static inline struct device_d *
> +of_platform_device_create(struct device_node *np, struct device_d *parent)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct device_d *
> +of_device_create_on_demand(struct device_node *np);
Extra semicolon. Could you compile test without CONFIG_OFTREE?
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct device_d *
> +of_device_create_on_demand_by_alias(struct device_node *np);
> {
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline struct device_d *
> +of_device_create_on_demand_by_dev_id(struct device_node *np,
> + const struct of_device_id *ids)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +of_devices_create_on_demand_by_property(const char *property_name)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline int of_bus_n_addr_cells(struct device_node *np)
> {
> return 0;
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-28 15:50 [PATCH 00/18] Barebox Deep-Probe Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 01/18] video: ssd1307fb: fix VBAT supply id Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:58 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 02/18] ARM: boards: mx6-sabrelite: [cosmetic] make use of IMX_GPIO_NR Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 16:00 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 03/18] drivers: gpio: treewide: [cosmetic] use register_driver_macros Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 16:04 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-09-29 8:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 04/18] ARM: mx6-sabrelite: remove obsolete sabrelite_mem_init() Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 16:07 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 05/18] spi: core: don't ignore register_device failures Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 06/18] regulator: improve of_regulator_register error handling Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 07/18] regulator: test of_regulator_register input before accessing it Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 16:11 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 08/18] regulator: stpmic1: fix registering missed regulators Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 09/18] regulator: add device reference to regulator_dev Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 10/18] regulator: treewide: drop local device_d reference Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 11/18] of: platform: fix of_amba_device_create stub return value Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 12/18] of: base: move memory init from DT to initcall Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 13/18] of: base: move clock init from of_probe() to barebox_register_of() Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 14/18] initcall: add of_populate_initcall Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 15/18] common: add initial barebox deep-probe support Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 16:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2020-09-29 15:55 ` Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 16/18] ARM: i.MX: esdctl: add " Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 17/18] ARM: stm32mp: ddrctrl: " Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 18/18] ARM: boards: mx6-sabrelite: " Marco Felsch
2020-09-28 16:58 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-09-29 8:30 ` [PATCH 00/18] Barebox Deep-Probe Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=748eb0a5-a5ac-7be2-d909-f3af184db38d@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox