mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Zink <j.zink@pengutronix.de>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>, patchwork-jzi@pengutronix.de
Cc: Barebox Mailing List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: crc32: make crc32 available in PBL
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 12:55:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80bc6b24-35c5-f895-ace2-887ceddaa542@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44ee704c-8e28-a0a6-6627-c33f0bd56d3d@pengutronix.de>

Hi Ahmad,

thank you for your review.

On 8/29/23 12:45, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 29.08.23 12:29, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 29.08.23 11:28, Johannes Zink wrote:
>>> crc32 may be required in PBL for checking data integrity. Add
>>> CONFIG_CRC32_EARLY to kconfig which allows adding crc32 also in the PBL.
>>>
>>> As the PBL has no dynamic allocation, do not use dynamic CRC table
>>> generation when CRC32 is added in PBL.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Zink <j.zink@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> To: Barebox Mailing List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
>>> Cc: Johannes Zink <j.zink@pengutronix.de>
>>> Cc: patchwork-jzi@pengutronix.de
>>> ---
>>>   crypto/Kconfig  | 3 +++
>>>   crypto/Makefile | 1 +
>>>   crypto/crc32.c  | 6 +++---
>>>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/crypto/Kconfig b/crypto/Kconfig
>>> index 04e5ef43705b..6e18b5868061 100644
>>> --- a/crypto/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/crypto/Kconfig
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ menu "Crypto support"
>>>   config CRC32
>>>   	bool
>>>   
>>> +config CRC32_EARLY
>>> +	bool
>>> +
>>>   config CRC_ITU_T
>>>   	bool
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/crypto/Makefile b/crypto/Makefile
>>> index 22035d4f69ee..24e1f3d91797 100644
>>> --- a/crypto/Makefile
>>> +++ b/crypto/Makefile
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA1_GENERIC)	+= sha1.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA224_GENERIC)	+= sha2.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA256_GENERIC)	+= sha2.o
>>>   pbl-y					+= sha2.o digest.o
>>> +lwl-$(CONFIG_CRC32_EARLY)		+= crc32.o
>>
>> pbl-obj- is the correct prefix. lwl- means pbl- if we have PBL
>> support at all and obj- otherwise (for legacy systems without PBL),
>> while pbl-obj- is equivalent to duplicating the line once with pbl-
>> and once with obj-
> 
> s/pbl-obj-/obj-pbl-/ :)
> 

ack, gonna fix this for v2.

>>
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA384_GENERIC)	+= sha4.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA512_GENERIC)	+= sha4.o
>>>   obj-y	+= memneq.o
>>> diff --git a/crypto/crc32.c b/crypto/crc32.c
>>> index 95cb2212db2b..284d39351682 100644
>>> --- a/crypto/crc32.c
>>> +++ b/crypto/crc32.c
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>>>   #define STATIC static inline
>>>   #endif
>>>   
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE) && !defined(__PBL__)
>>
>> You could also replace the dynamic allocation with a static array initialized
>> to zero. That way you can have a dynamic crc table even in PBL without affecting
>> image size as the BSS is not part of the image.

ack. Is this ok?

#ifdef __PBL__
   static uint32_t _crc_table_memory[sizeof(uint32_t) * 256] = { 0 };
#endif

static void *alloc_crc_table() {
#ifdef __PBL__
	return _crc_table_memory;
#else
	return xmalloc(sizeof(uint32_t) * 256);
#endif
}

If so, I can change it for v2.

Best regards
Johannes


>>
>>>   
>>>   static uint32_t *crc_table;
>>>   
>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ STATIC uint32_t crc32(uint32_t crc, const void *_buf, unsigned int len)
>>>   {
>>>       const unsigned char *buf = _buf;
>>>   
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE) && !defined(__PBL__)
>>>   	if (!crc_table)
>>>   		make_crc_table();
>>>   #endif
>>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ STATIC uint32_t crc32_no_comp(uint32_t crc, const void *_buf, unsigned int len)
>>>   {
>>>      const unsigned char *buf = _buf;
>>>   
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE) && !defined(__PBL__)
>>>   	if (!crc_table)
>>>   		make_crc_table();
>>>   #endif
>>>
>>> ---
>>> base-commit: bef38b18eeb5d2f1fac334fb8b831e47261e099c
>>> change-id: 20230829-crc32_in_pbl-4d824629d4e2
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                | Johannes Zink                  |
Steuerwalder Str. 21            | https://www.pengutronix.de/    |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0       |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555    |




  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-29 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-29  9:28 Johannes Zink
2023-08-29 10:29 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-08-29 10:45   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-08-29 10:55     ` Johannes Zink [this message]
2023-08-29 11:08       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-08-29 12:05         ` Johannes Zink
2023-08-29 12:17           ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80bc6b24-35c5-f895-ace2-887ceddaa542@pengutronix.de \
    --to=j.zink@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=patchwork-jzi@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox