From: Andreas Geisenhainer <Andreas.Geisenhainer@atsonline.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Oselas 2018.12.0 toolchain seems to break barebox for AM335x
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:15:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875f8014-b696-b0dc-3c9b-0a9e2d573aa6@atsonline.de> (raw)
Hello barebox mailinglist.
While updating my local ptxdist setup I ran into the following problem.
Updating the toolchain to OSELAS_2018.12.0 and copiling barebox
it decided not to start anymore. To my surprise, compiling the
exact same source with the previous OSELAS toolchain (2018.02.0)
just works.
I installed the toolchains through the official debian repository.
We're still running an older barebox (2015.09), so i grabed a
stock, barebox 2019.06.1 and it produces the exact same behaviour.
We're running barebox an a Phytec PhyCORE AM335x platform, and the
behaviour does emerge for the default "barebox-am335x-phytec-phycore.img"
image from barebox.
* Exhibit A: barebox 2019.06.1 compiled with OSELAS_2018.12.0 (gcc 8.2.1)
----------------------------------8<-------------------------------------
barebox@sbo800:/mnt/10.0.1.6/rootbootm -vv -c barebox_2019.06.1_k1.img
Loading ARM barebox image 'barebox_2019.06.1_k1.img'
using internal devicetree
OS image not yet relocated
Passing control to OMAP barebox handler
exitcall-> devices_shutdown+0x1/0x24
exitcall-> arch_shutdown+0x1/0x1c
---------------------------------->8-------------------------------------
* Exhibit B: barebox 2019.06.1 compiled with OSELAS_2018.02.0 (gcc 7.3.1)
----------------------------------8<-------------------------------------
barebox@sbo800:/mnt/10.0.1.6/rootbootm -vv -c barebox_2019.06.1_k2.img
Loading ARM barebox image 'barebox_2019.06.1_k2.img'
using internal devicetree
OS image not yet relocated
Passing control to OMAP barebox handler
exitcall-> devices_shutdown+0x1/0x24
exitcall-> arch_shutdown+0x1/0x1c
start.c: memory at 0x80000000, size 0x20000000
start.c: found Compressed DTB in boarddata, copying to 0x9fdfd040
start.c: initializing malloc pool at 0x8fefe820 (size 0x0fefe820)
start.c: starting barebox...
----------------------------------<8-------------------------------------
What's the best course of action to debug this further?
There's a slight possibility for a barebox config option to be the culprit,
since i copied our local config into the extracted archive.
But it does not really explain why this breaks.
kind regards
Andreas Geisenhainer
--
_
__ _| |_ ___
/ _` | __/ __|
| (_| | |_\__ \
\__,_|\__|___/
Elektronik GmbH
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 14:15 Andreas Geisenhainer [this message]
2019-07-10 7:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-07-10 8:14 ` Andreas Geisenhainer
2019-10-25 8:48 ` Andreas Geisenhainer
2019-11-12 7:48 ` Andreas Geisenhainer
2019-11-12 11:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-11-12 14:37 ` Andreas Geisenhainer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875f8014-b696-b0dc-3c9b-0a9e2d573aa6@atsonline.de \
--to=andreas.geisenhainer@atsonline.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox