From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp10.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.132] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YIMB6-0001ay-7j for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:56:56 +0000 From: Robert Jarzmik References: <1422709810-30622-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20150202091705.GW12209@pengutronix.de> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:56:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150202091705.GW12209@pengutronix.de> (Sascha Hauer's message of "Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:17:05 +0100") Message-ID: <8761bkb0ri.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc1111: add 16 bits accessors, allow address shift To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Sascha Hauer writes: > Applied all, thanks > > Sascha Thanks Sascha, I noticed that in my patchset I moved the "struct smc91111_accessors {...}" from smc9111.c to include/net/smc91111.h. This was when I thought the accessors would be settable from platform code. Do you want me to send an incremental patch to reverse this ? Cheers. -- Robert _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox