From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail01.prevas.se ([62.95.78.3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wn05o-0008V3-Jf for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 06:33:38 +0000 From: Esben Haabendal References: <1400533184-668-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1400533184-668-6-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <537B6FDF.2050507@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 08:35:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <537B6FDF.2050507@gmail.com> (Sebastian Hesselbarth's message of "Tue, 20 May 2014 17:08:15 +0200") Message-ID: <87ppj7r65c.fsf@xpc.ulstruplund.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] of: Drop devicetree merge support To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Sebastian Hesselbarth writes: > On 05/19/2014 10:59 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> I assume I am the only person knowing that barebox is able to >> merge devicetrees. This feature seems broken for a while now since >> trying to merge devicetress results in: >> >> unflatten: too many end nodes > > Uhm, I know about it because I see it every time I load an updated > dtb on my hacky Chromecast barebox. Loading the dtb a second time > again works then.. > > Anyway, I don't want to merge any trees but overwrite the existing, > so I am fine with the removal ;) I actually wanted to merge dtb trees for a project at hand, but ended up doing the merge before hand. So no, you were not the only one knowing about it ;) /Esben _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox