mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] watchdog: implement generic support for .running device parameter
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:46:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c68dcf1-5033-efa5-66b5-50679f1ca6b0@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105104008.qrivs4orphopplzz@pengutronix.de>

Hi,

On 11/5/19 11:40 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:14:05PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Linux watchdog have an optional WDOG_HW_RUNNING bit that is used in
>> conjunction with CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED to automatically
>> ping running watchdogs until userspace takes over.
>>
>> So far, when we ported Linux drivers, we dropped this detection, but it
>> would be useful to have this information in barebox as well:
>>
>> The American Megatrends BIOS I am using allows configuring the hardware
>> watchdog from the BIOS. barebox enables the WDT as well, so in normal
>> operation we would never notice if after a BIOS update, the watchdog is
>> no longer enabled. If we maintain a running parameter on watchdog
>> devices, board code can be written to check whether the watchdog device
>> is indeed running.
> 
> To write such code I would prefer to have a function which returns the
> running status rather than playing with getenv().

Ye, board code can use watchdog_hw_running added in this patch.
Hush scripts can use the device parameter. I'll amend the commit message.

> Additionally there is
> a function missing in the watchdog code which returns a watchdog by its
> name. This can be a future excercise, no need to do it in this patch.

Ok.

> 
>> @@ -45,7 +47,18 @@ int watchdog_set_timeout(struct watchdog *wd, unsigned timeout)
>>  
>>  	pr_debug("setting timeout on %s to %ds\n", watchdog_name(wd), timeout);
>>  
>> -	return wd->set_timeout(wd, timeout);
>> +	ret = wd->set_timeout(wd, timeout);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	if (test_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING_SUPPORTED, &wd->status)) {
>> +		if (timeout)
>> +			set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wd->status);
>> +		else
>> +			clear_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wd->status);
>> +	}
> 
> When we just started the watchdog we actually know that it is running,
> so we could support the parameter for all watchdogs once it's started.
> 
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(watchdog_set_timeout);
>>  
>> @@ -118,6 +131,15 @@ static int watchdog_register_poller(struct watchdog *wd)
>>  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static const char *watchdog_get_running(struct device_d *dev, struct param_d *p)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This won't ever fail, because the parameter is only registed when
>> +	 * test_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING_SUPPORTED, &w->status) is true
>> +	 */
>> +	return watchdog_hw_running((struct watchdog *)p->value) ? "1" : "0";
>> +}
> 
> Casting p->value to (struct watchdog *) seems wrong. However, this
> function shouldn't be needed, see below.
> 
>> +
>>  static int watchdog_register_dev(struct watchdog *wd, const char *name, int id)
>>  {
>>  	wd->dev.parent = wd->hwdev;
>> @@ -162,6 +184,15 @@ int watchdog_register(struct watchdog *wd)
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>> +	if (test_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING_SUPPORTED, &wd->status)) {
>> +		p = dev_add_param(&wd->dev, "running", NULL,
>> +				  watchdog_get_running, PARAM_FLAG_RO);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(p))
>> +			return PTR_ERR(p);
>> +
>> +		p->value = (char *)wd;
>> +	}
> 
> How about adding this parameter unconditionally, with "unknown" as value
> when WDOG_HW_RUNNING_SUPPORTED is not set. You can use
> dev_add_param_enum() here.

Sounds good.

> 
> Sascha
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-04 22:14 [PATCH v2 1/4] watchdog: always populate watchdog priority from device tree if possible Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-04 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] watchdog: implement generic support for .running device parameter Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-05 10:40   ` Sascha Hauer
2019-11-05 10:46     ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2019-11-05 10:51       ` Sascha Hauer
2019-11-05 11:10       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-05 11:18         ` Sascha Hauer
2019-11-08 11:04           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-04 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] watchdog: imxwd: support .running device parameter on i.MX2+ Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-04 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] watchdog: f71808e: support .running device parameter Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c68dcf1-5033-efa5-66b5-50679f1ca6b0@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox