* [PATCH] of: platform: don't fail of_find_device_by_node() if no driver bound
@ 2023-09-14 7:30 Ahmad Fatoum
2023-09-26 11:38 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2023-09-14 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox; +Cc: Ahmad Fatoum
of_find_device_by_node() may be called by a driver following
of_platform_populate in order to bind the children to drivers.
It's thus wrong to return NULL when a device has been found, but no
driver was registered. That also aligns the function with the
expectation resulting from its name: A device is found and devices may
be bound or not.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index bd5f2ad82c6b..1f79a539f541 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -23,11 +23,9 @@
struct device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
{
struct device *dev;
- int ret;
- ret = of_device_ensure_probed(np);
- if (ret)
- return NULL;
+ /* Not having a driver is not an error here */
+ (void)of_device_ensure_probed(np);
if (deep_probe_is_supported())
return np->dev;
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] of: platform: don't fail of_find_device_by_node() if no driver bound
2023-09-14 7:30 [PATCH] of: platform: don't fail of_find_device_by_node() if no driver bound Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2023-09-26 11:38 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-05 6:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2023-09-26 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ahmad Fatoum; +Cc: barebox
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:30:18AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> of_find_device_by_node() may be called by a driver following
> of_platform_populate in order to bind the children to drivers.
> It's thus wrong to return NULL when a device has been found, but no
> driver was registered. That also aligns the function with the
> expectation resulting from its name: A device is found and devices may
> be bound or not.
I hesitated applying this one because I am not sure if some users expect
to have a driver bound when of_find_device_by_node() returns a valid
pointer.
I applied it now, let's see what happens.
Sascha
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index bd5f2ad82c6b..1f79a539f541 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -23,11 +23,9 @@
> struct device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device *dev;
> - int ret;
>
> - ret = of_device_ensure_probed(np);
> - if (ret)
> - return NULL;
> + /* Not having a driver is not an error here */
> + (void)of_device_ensure_probed(np);
>
> if (deep_probe_is_supported())
> return np->dev;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] of: platform: don't fail of_find_device_by_node() if no driver bound
2023-09-26 11:38 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2023-10-05 6:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2023-10-05 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
Hello Sascha,
On 26.09.23 13:38, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:30:18AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> of_find_device_by_node() may be called by a driver following
>> of_platform_populate in order to bind the children to drivers.
>> It's thus wrong to return NULL when a device has been found, but no
>> driver was registered. That also aligns the function with the
>> expectation resulting from its name: A device is found and devices may
>> be bound or not.
>
> I hesitated applying this one because I am not sure if some users expect
> to have a driver bound when of_find_device_by_node() returns a valid
> pointer.
>
> I applied it now, let's see what happens.
I ran into this porting the CAAM driver to work on i.MX8M. I don't know
if existing drivers are affected, but it's the correct thing to do.
>
> Sascha
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/platform.c | 6 ++----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> index bd5f2ad82c6b..1f79a539f541 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> @@ -23,11 +23,9 @@
>> struct device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> struct device *dev;
>> - int ret;
>>
>> - ret = of_device_ensure_probed(np);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return NULL;
>> + /* Not having a driver is not an error here */
>> + (void)of_device_ensure_probed(np);
>>
>> if (deep_probe_is_supported())
>> return np->dev;
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-05 6:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-14 7:30 [PATCH] of: platform: don't fail of_find_device_by_node() if no driver bound Ahmad Fatoum
2023-09-26 11:38 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-05 6:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox