From: Renaud Barbier <Renaud.Barbier@ametek.com>
To: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: LS1021A performance
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL0PR07MB5665003604A904B8AFBEB466EC8E9@BL0PR07MB5665.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Hello,
I am looking into the performance of the LS1021A between Linux and Barebox and a PPC P1014
I noticed the following on md5sum calculation on 1MB file;
On Barebox, md5sum of a 1MB file in memory:
barebox@LS1021A-IOT Board:/ time md5sum /file
27a45e1d2fc461638aafce09b6397841 /file
time: 494ms
The DDR is cacheable:
barebox:/ mmuinfo 0x80000000
PAR result for 0x80000000:
privileged read: 0x8000005c
Physical Address [31:12]: 0x80000000
Reserved [11]: 0x0
Not Outer Shareable [10]: 0x0
Non-Secure [9]: 0x0
Impl. def. [8]: 0x0
Shareable [7]: 0x0
Inner mem. attr. [6:4]: 0x5 (0b101 Write-Back, Write-Allocate)
Outer mem. attr. [3:2]: 0x3 (0b11 Write-Back, no Write-Allocate)
SuperSection [1]: 0x0
Failure [0]: 0x0
privileged write: 0x8000005c
Physical Address [31:12]: 0x80000000
Reserved [11]: 0x0
Not Outer Shareable [10]: 0x0
Non-Secure [9]: 0x0
Impl. def. [8]: 0x0
Shareable [7]: 0x0
Inner mem. attr. [6:4]: 0x5 (0b101 Write-Back, Write-Allocate)
Outer mem. attr. [3:2]: 0x3 (0b11 Write-Back, no Write-Allocate)
SuperSection [1]: 0x0
Failure [0]: 0x0
On a Freescale P1014 (PPC)with Barebox:
time md5sum self1
f168af3541bc7109150e6be2f6c8cde4 self1
time: 57ms
On Linux:
[root@openware]# time md5sum /tmp/mtd0
26d8158619e5791859519654557aeeba /tmp/mtd0
real 0m0.029s
user 0m0.025s
sys 0m0.001s
This is almost a 20 fold difference.
>From my In-Circuit-Emulator, the cache is enabled on both Linux and Barebox. My guess it that it comes down how the MMU is used.
Any input on how to speed up the boot loader would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Renaud
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 11:34 Renaud Barbier [this message]
2023-03-30 11:45 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2023-03-30 13:31 ` Renaud Barbier
2023-03-30 14:17 ` Lucas Stach
2023-03-30 15:17 ` Renaud Barbier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BL0PR07MB5665003604A904B8AFBEB466EC8E9@BL0PR07MB5665.namprd07.prod.outlook.com \
--to=renaud.barbier@ametek.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox