From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ddcQe-00052g-0D for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:14:31 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id e124so1478469oig.0 for ; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 06:13:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7360e7wsyx.fsf@pengutronix.de> References: <7360e7wsyx.fsf@pengutronix.de> From: Mabcded Babcde Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:13:49 +0200 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new command fs2bridge for socfpga To: Steffen Trumtrar Cc: Andrey Smirnov , "barebox@lists.infradead.org" 2017-08-01 11:13 GMT+02:00 Steffen Trumtrar : > > Hi! > > Andrey Smirnov writes: > >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mabcded Babcde >> wrote: >>> 2017-07-28 15:42 GMT+02:00 Andrey Smirnov : >>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Mabcded Babcde >>>> wrote: >>>>> 2017-07-27 20:49 GMT+02:00 Andrey Smirnov : >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Mabcded Babcde >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> this patch adds a new command to barebox. It is used to enable or >>>>>>> disable the fpga-to-sdram bridges on socfpgas. The patch is based on a >>>>>>> manual from altera >>>>>>> (https://www.altera.com/support/support-resources/knowledge-base/embedded/2016/how-and-when-can-i-enable-the-fpga2sdram-bridge-on-cyclone-v-soc.html) >>>>>>> and a implementation for u-boot >>>>>>> (https://github.com/rogerq/u-boot/blob/master/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc.c). >>>>>>> The fpga2sdram fpga configuration can only be set when the SDRAM >>>>>>> interface is idle. So it is necessary to use the on-chip ram. >>>>>> >>>>>> And by "on-chip ram" you mean i-cache and not SRAM block used by first >>>>>> stage bootloader, correct? I am just a bit confused by the wording. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, my fault. I meant i-cache. >>>>> >>>>>>> To bring all fpga2sdram bridges out of reset it is necessary to write 0x3FFF to >>>>>>> the register. Only the fpga2sdram bridges are enabled or disabled but >>>>>>> no other bridges like the axi bridges. >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux kernel already has: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/altera-fpga2sdram-bridge.txt?h=v4.13-rc2 >>>>>> >>>>>> so, IMHO, it would be better to implement a compatible driver and, if >>>>>> ability to change the value at run-time is needed, add "enable" >>>>>> property to it rather than introducing a separate command. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But how can I ensure that the SDRAM is idle? I quote Altera: >>>>> "First time enabling of the FPGA2SDRAM bridge within Linux is not >>>>> supported as the SDRAM subsystem cannot be easily put into a >>>>> guaranteed idle state." >>>>> >>>> >>>> I feel like we are talking about different things. What I am trying to >>>> say that instead of adding this functionality to Barebox as a >>>> standalone command, it would be better to add it _to Barebox_ as a >>>> driver that claims compatibility with "altr,socfpga-fpga2sdram-bridge" >>>> and implements all of the necessary logic there. It would be the same >>>> code running in the boot-loader but triggered to executed via >>>> different means, so it should literally be the same in terms of SDRAM >>>> access quiescence. A somewhat relative example of that approach would >>>> be "drivers/firmware/socfpga.c". >>> >>> Ok, I hardcoded my code from the command to drivers/firmware/socfpga.c >>> for testing purposes. That didn't seem to work. >> >> I'd double check that CONFIG_FIRMWARE and >> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_ALTERA_SOCFPGA are set to "y". >> >>> However how would I >>> enable or disable the bridge? With a parameter? Where can I add it and >>> change it? >>> >>>> >> >> The driver in firmware/socfpga.c should create a "fpga0" device, after >> which, you cat set that device's variables/attributes by simply doing: >> >> fpga0.variable_name = value >> >> and get them via >> >> echo ${fpga0.variable_name} >> > > The right approach should be adding a proper bridge driver like in the > kernel. Then in the fpgamgr_program_finish enable all registered > bridges. And set the APPFLYCFG bit in the bridge driver. > Or do I miss something? > > The cacheline magic seems rather fragile and therefore just running a > function (with almost the same assembler code) from OCRAM seems to be the > more robust option. > > As a matter of fact, I already have the bridge drivers ported to > barebox. I can post the series as an RFC as I haven't tested it since I > rebased it to v2017.07.0. I built Barebox successfully with your drivers, but the fpga-bridge wasn't enabled. And where is the OCRAM part in your driver? > > > Regards, > Steffen > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Steffen Trumtrar | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox