From: Pascal Vizeli <pascal.vizeli@syshack.ch>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Pascal Vizeli <pvizeli@syshack.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] command: oftree: support load device tree from memory
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:42:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACvFaDehzoBCPQRELost2kPNOMM-RaXxjk+pk59H7at4WRr68Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607085312.xtrjlsmuxfvfv4jj@pengutronix.de>
That sounds good. Thanks for the direction.
My workaround look like:
memcpy -d /tmp/rpi.dtb 0xf42400 0 0x10000
of_dump -f /tmp/rpi.dtb > /dev/null
oftree -f -l /tmp/rpi.dtb
Without 'of_dump', the 'oftree' give a bad magic 0x5.... error.
I need add support for HassOS to raspberry and in a second round I
will try to implement your suggestion.
best regards
Pascal
2018-06-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Pascal Vizeli wrote:
>> Thanks for this workaround. I will use this.
>>
>> I will later send a patch they store the device tree address on
>> raspberry into a variable.
>> So that user can load this, if he need it.
>>
>> The question is now, would you allow to load a device tree with a
>> memory address on oftree utility?
>> And if yes, where is the best place to add this function.
>
> Instead of a command I would prefer if you could just store r2 from
> the original bootloader you have been started with, and in a board
> specific initcall you copy the devicetree you found in memory to a
> file. Then the user has access to the devicetree with regular file
> commands and there is no need to guess the memory address where the
> original bootloader stored the device tree.
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-06 15:16 Pascal Vizeli
2018-06-06 19:57 ` Andrey Smirnov
2018-06-07 7:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-06-07 8:29 ` Pascal Vizeli
2018-06-07 8:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-06-07 10:42 ` Pascal Vizeli [this message]
2018-06-07 12:45 ` Pascal Vizeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACvFaDehzoBCPQRELost2kPNOMM-RaXxjk+pk59H7at4WRr68Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pascal.vizeli@syshack.ch \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pvizeli@syshack.ch \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox