From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::244]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fKpid-0003rO-9I for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 18:39:42 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-x244.google.com with SMTP id g1-v6so15468574iob.2 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180521115438.26493-1-pmamonov@gmail.com> References: <20180521115438.26493-1-pmamonov@gmail.com> From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 11:39:26 -0700 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] various fixes for MIPS64 To: Peter Mamonov Cc: Barebox List On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:54 AM, Peter Mamonov wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a second revision of the patchset which fixes various issues with 64 bit > barebox, primarily MIPS related. IMHO all of these patches are ready for > application. > Don't think I've seen any comments on: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2018-May/032985.html Right now it's not clear if that thread just slipped though the cracks or you decided to keep the code as is. Latter is fine with me, I just want to make sure it is not the former. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox