From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mno-spe’
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:41:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqEcMK-npMm57w8w-jVJP89nCxGcoFKaJCOmGCMs=WGcnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123150153.11a91063828b62bfd89c9bdf@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:02 AM Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sascha!
>
> I'm playing with MAKEALL script to build as many defconfigs as possible.
> My build environment is base on Debian Buster.
> Debian Buster has cross compiler for PowerPC32.
>
> Alas I have no success with debian powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc 8.2.0-2.
>
> After
>
> CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnu- ./MAKEALL -a ppc
>
> the error message is:
>
> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mno-spe’; did you mean ‘-fno-see’?
> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mspe=no’; did you mean ‘-misel=no’?
> make[2]: *** [/home/builduser/barebox/./Kbuild:40: arch/ppc/lib/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [/home/builduser/barebox/Makefile:832: prepare0] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mno-spe’; did you mean ‘-fno-see’?
> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mspe=no’; did you mean ‘-misel=no’?
> make[3]: *** [/home/builduser/barebox/scripts/Makefile.build:250: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
>
> With this linux kernel-based patch ppc build has no fail.
>
> diff --git a/arch/ppc/Makefile b/arch/ppc/Makefile
> index 05ec2438a..e575e5923 100644
> --- a/arch/ppc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/ppc/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
>
> CPPFLAGS += -ffixed-r14 -m32 \
> -meabi -D __PPC__ -D CONFIG_PPC \
> - -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-spe -mspe=no
> + -fno-strict-aliasing
> +
> +# No SPE instruction when building kernel
> +# (We use all available options to help semi-broken compilers)
> +CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-spe)
> +CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mspe=no)
>
> ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> CPPFLAGS += -fPIC -mrelocatable
>
>
> I have no real powerpc experience to submit this patch.
>
> Could you please comment this patch?
>
Since up until a year ago I was using Barebox on MPC8544 on a daily
basis and have some PowerPC patches I've been meaning to upstream,
I'll chime in. You wouldn't see this build failure if you were using a
PowerPC toolchain build with support for e500 enabled. AFAIK, distros
don't usually ship anything like that, but you can get a pre-build one
from here https://toolchains.bootlin.com/releases_powerpc-e500mc.html
However, I've never tried to build Barebox using a generic PowerPC
toolchain, so I don't really know for sure if having e500 support
truly matters for getting a working Barebox binary. Given that, I
don't see any harm in the change above.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-24 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 12:01 Antony Pavlov
2019-01-24 2:41 ` Andrey Smirnov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHQ1cqEcMK-npMm57w8w-jVJP89nCxGcoFKaJCOmGCMs=WGcnQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=antonynpavlov@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox