From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1clMMq-0003h9-Hh for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 21:10:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id o126so5229234pfb.3 for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:09:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170307081330.gb3iz6gebpbwlt3r@pengutronix.de> References: <20170306225356.31475-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20170307081330.gb3iz6gebpbwlt3r@pengutronix.de> From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:09:36 -0800 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates To: Sascha Hauer Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I recently had a chance to work with at91sam9x5ek board and as a part >> of that effort I converted the code to support features found in >> Barebox for i.MX based SoCs. Most notably this patchset converts >> at91sam9x5ek to use multi-image PBL build process as well as adds >> support for board initialization from attached devicetree blob. >> >> Sascha, at least for now, all of the patches, in chronological order, >> are included in this submission. However if this proves to be too >> burdensome to review, I'd be more than happy to split it into several >> individual submissions. One such division could be: >> >> - Generic bug fixes/infrastructure enhancements >> - Peripheral drivers updates >> - at91sam9x5ek specific changes >> >> Please let me know if that is preferrable. > > I had a short look at all patches, overall they look good. Nevertheless > it would be good to sort them like you suggested. It just makes it > easier to apply. > OK, will do. > Thanks for working on this, a general AT91 overhaul was long overdue. I > hope this series prepares a path to cleanup the other AT91 SoCs aswell. > Yeah, I have a bit more AT91 based hardware (at least SAMA5D3 Xplained board and maybe more), so I was hoping to get those done after this merge request. > The clock support you ported over from the kernel is for all AT91 SoCs > and not only one, right? Yeah, I belive it should be usable by the whole AT91 family. Thanks, Andrey _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox