mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] e1000: Consolidate register offset fixups
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:35:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqFLEXoD0k6zFC5AgyrXQu4TAJX8SZdgmd4YPe4g8U5GvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464727385.15779.125.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local>

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 10:09 -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> Consolidate all code taking care on CSR offset differences for i210
>> chips into a single place in the driver and integrate that
>> funcionality into E1000_{READ,WRITE}_REG macros. This way we can get
>> rid of all those
>>
>>     if (hw->mac_type == e1000_igb) {
>>        ....
>>     } else {
>>        ....
>>     }
>>
>> snippets sprinkled all across the driver code.
>>
>> +
>> +static inline uint32_t e1000_true_offset(struct e1000_hw *hw, uint32_t reg)
>> +{
>
> Any reason this needs to be inlined?  gcc space vs size optimization
> choice usually does the right thing.

No reason, just a leftover of copy and paste from header file (I
initially put those functions there). Will fix in v2.

>
>> +     if (hw->mac_type == e1000_igb) {
>> +             unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +             const struct e1000_fixup_table fixup_table[] = {
>> +                     { E1000_EEWR,     E1000_I210_EEWR     },
>> +                     { E1000_PHY_CTRL, E1000_I210_PHY_CTRL },
>> +                     { E1000_EEMNGCTL, E1000_I210_EEMNGCTL },
>> +             };
>> +
>> +             for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fixup_table); i++) {
>> +                     if (fixup_table[i].orig == reg)
>> +                             return fixup_table[i].fixed;
>> +             }
>
> Looping through the table on each reg access seems a bit costly.  What
> if the registers with different addresses had a flag bit in their
> definition?  Then you could check the bit and only translate those that
> need translating.  It would also document in the register definition
> that the register got translated.
>
> #define I210_ALT   0x100000  /* register has alternate addr on I210 */
> #define E1000_EEWR (0x0102C | I210_ALT)/* EEPROM Write Register - RW */
>
> if (reg & I210_ALT) {
>   reg &= ~I210_ALT;
>   if (hw->mac_type == e1000_igb) {
>      /* look up alternate. note a case statement can be faster... */
>      case (reg) {
>        case E1000_EEWR: reg = E1000_I210_EEWR; break;
>        default: ;
>   }
> }
>

Sure, sounds like a good idea, will do in v2.

Thanks,
Andrey

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 17:09 [PATCH 00/21] e1000 code cleanup and iNVM support Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/21] e1000: Split driver into multiple files Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/21] e1000: Include <net.h> in e1000.h Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/21] e1000: Convert E1000_*_REG macros to functions Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/21] e1000: Fix a bug in e1000_detect_gig_phy Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/21] e1000: Remove unnecessary variable Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/21] e1000: Do not read same register twice Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/21] e1000: Remove unneeded i210 specific register code Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/21] e1000: Consolidate register offset fixups Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 20:42   ` Trent Piepho
2016-06-01 21:35     ` Andrey Smirnov [this message]
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/21] e1000: Remove 'use_eewr' parameter Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/21] e1000: Remove 'page_size' Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/21] e1000: Simplify EEPROM init for e1000_80003es2lan Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/21] e1000: Simplify EEPROM init for e1000_igb Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/21] e1000: Consolidate SPI EEPROM init code Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 14/21] e1000: Consolidate Microwire " Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 15/21] e1000: Fix a bug in e1000_probe() Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 16/21] e1000: Remove unnecessary intialization Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 17/21] e1000: Refactor Flash/EEPROM reading code Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 18/21] e1000: Properly release SW_FW_SYNC semaphore bits Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 19/21] e1000: Add EEPROM access locking for i210 Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 20/21] e1000: Add a "poll register" function Andrey Smirnov
2016-05-31 17:09 ` [PATCH 21/21] e1000: Expose i210's iNVM as a cdev Andrey Smirnov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHQ1cqFLEXoD0k6zFC5AgyrXQu4TAJX8SZdgmd4YPe4g8U5GvQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tpiepho@kymetacorp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox