From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1a61a1-0001wK-0v for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 19:36:13 +0000 Received: by ioir85 with SMTP id r85so957224ioi.1 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:35:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151207102335.GG11966@pengutronix.de> References: <1449474763-14099-1-git-send-email-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20151207102335.GG11966@pengutronix.de> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:35:52 -0800 Message-ID: From: Andrey Smirnov List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] imx: ocotp: Add code to initialize 'cdev->device_node' To: Sascha Hauer Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > I had to port the LM75 driver to barebox just a few days ago and so came > up with exactly the same patch 2/7 and 3/7. I applied 1-3 right away. > Shucks! I had those three patches sitting on my laptop for a couple of weeks. Sorry for procrastinating with submitting them, could have saved you some trouble :-) > In my case I not only have a LM75 but also a PT100 connected to a > Microchip MCP3421 which in Linux is abstracted as a IIO device. IIO has > the advantage that it's more formalized and has it's own device tree > binding that allows to connect sensor devices with their consumers. I > picked some of the pieces from IIO and created something I called > iodevice. I'll post it in the next few days. One thing I am missing in > your approach is the readout of values as device parameters so that the > values can be evaluated in scripts. On the other hand you have a command > that allows to show the values of all sensors which I currently don't > have. Maybe we can distil the best of both approaches. I would be more than happy to work on combining our code. How about you go ahead and submit your framework/drivers and I'll rework TEMPMON and hwmon (should we rename the command?) patches to use it. I doubt there would be anything worth salvaging in my LM75 driver, so we can just drop that patch. Sounds good? Thanks, Andrey _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox