From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::243]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fKpnw-0005mV-IH for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 18:45:10 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-x243.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so22297473ite.3 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 11:44:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180521115438.26493-2-pmamonov@gmail.com> References: <20180521115438.26493-1-pmamonov@gmail.com> <20180521115438.26493-2-pmamonov@gmail.com> From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 11:44:52 -0700 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] resource: fix iomem root resource for 64 bit To: Peter Mamonov Cc: Barebox List On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:54 AM, Peter Mamonov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Mamonov > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov IMHO, Signed-off-by is a bit of an overkill for this. I am perfectly fine not getting credit for trivial suggestions as was this one in general, but if we must, Suggested-by seems like a better fit. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox