From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cpntT-0001pL-Cw for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 03:22:05 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id p189so9719879pfp.0 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:21:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170317121947.qgopgneagvet6tg5@pengutronix.de> References: <20170316150448.11773-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20170317121947.qgopgneagvet6tg5@pengutronix.de> From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:21:41 -0700 Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates (part II/III) To: Sascha Hauer Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:04:37AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Hi everone, >> >> This is v2 of the second batch of AT91 related patches (original thread >> [1]). The patches gathered in this set are with a few exceptions are >> patches adding DT probing support for various AT91 drivers. >> >> Feedback from Sam has been incorporated, but other than that the code >> should be as it was in [1]. >> >> Any feedback is appreciated. > > Applied for now, let's see what the autobuilder tells us. > > Have you verified the code can still run on AT91 SoCs which don't use > the common clock code? Just went back and double checked with the HW I have at my disposal (SAM5D3 Xplained and AT91SAM9x5EK) and did a basic boot test for codebase before and after part I + part II. I found a couple of build problems (fixup patch sent to the mailing list), but other than that both boards booted as expected in all cases. I did have a problem with NAND driver on SAMA5, which was causing Barebox to hang, but since it was present in the build without any of my patches, I am inclined to think it is an unrelated regression. Regards, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox