I think this is not a bug, it's the documentation that is not clear here. The above is only useful in conjunction with -A in which case the description given with -d is shown as timeout text. It is what I thought but even with the -A option it doesn't work: menu -m test -s -A 10 -d "test2" test menu 1: test1 2: test2 3: test3 test2 8 So test2 is correctly selected for timeout (test2 8) but when the countdown terminate I obtain 1 WRS-3> / this means that the command executed is test1 Moreover, I think it should be usefull to have a -A infinite timeout options with a preselect option to help someone choose the next step or the default step. About the -S -n option I also think it is redundant but maybe someone thought implementing -S -d -- *Benoit RAT LAMY* Engineer (Sw) \ Ingeniero (Sw) fix. *(+34) 958 285 024* cel. *(+34) 617 989 123* e-mail: benoit@sevensols.com *www.sevensols.com / **www.sevensecurity.es* _________________________________ *C/ Baza, parcela 19 Nave 3 \ Polígono Ind. Juncaril \* *18210 - PELIGROS - GRANADA –SPAIN* On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:25:03PM +0200, Benoit RAT wrote: > > Hy guy, > > > > I found a small bug with menu autodisplay functionality that doesn't > work: > > > > menu -a -m test -d "test menu" > > menu -e -a -m test -c "echo 1" -d "test1" > > menu -e -a -m test -c "echo 2" -d "test2" > > menu -e -a -m test -c "echo 3" -d "test3" > > > > And then I try to autoselect test2 after chosing test 1 > > > > 1 > > barebox> menu -m test -s -d "test2" > > I think this is not a bug, it's the documentation that is not clear > here. The above is only useful in conjunction with -A in which case > the description given with -d is shown as timeout text. > > > > > But this does not work! > > > > The only way to perform this is to use > > > > menu -m test -S -n 2 > > menu -m test -s > > That's a point I do not understand. Looking at the code it's clear to me > why this have to be two commands, but I think it should be possible to > combine the select option with the show option. Furthermore I think the > -S option is quite useless. -S seems to used only to let the -n option > take effect. > > Overall it's not very clear which options exist and which options take > an argument. I've collected them and here is the result: > > -m specify menu to work on > -l list existing menus > -s show menu > -a Add a menu or, when -e is given additionally, add a menu > entry > -r remove a menu > -d description, in conjunction with > -a -e: Menu text to show > -A: timeout text to show > -A Autoselect selected entry in seconds > -c run when an entry is selected > -R reentrance, used with -a, do not leave the menu after > an entry is selected > -b 0|1 box entry. used with -a, add a yes/no entry > -e when given with -a, add a menu entry. When given with > -l, additionally to the menu also list the entries > -S -n select entry , starting at 1. Seperate command, > NOT together with actually showing the menu > > I think we should add this to the help text for the menu command, or > even better, replace the docs and the code for -S -n with a plain > -S > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | >