From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QjA7i-0001sl-9U for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:14:12 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so4567635iwn.36 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:14:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110718210440.GK20587@pengutronix.de> References: <1310994370-28444-1-git-send-email-antonynpavlov@gmail.com> <20110718210440.GK20587@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: From: Franck JULLIEN List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] debug_ll.h: add PUTS_LL() function To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org 2011/7/18 Sascha Hauer : > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:06:09PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov > > Applied both to next. > > Thanks > =A0Sascha > >> --- >> =A0include/debug_ll.h | =A0 13 +++++++++++++ >> =A01 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/debug_ll.h b/include/debug_ll.h >> index e99ae7d..6b1b174 100644 >> --- a/include/debug_ll.h >> +++ b/include/debug_ll.h >> @@ -35,9 +35,22 @@ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ch =3D ((v >> (i*= 4)) & 0xf);\ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ch +=3D (ch >=3D = 10) ? 'a' - 10 : '0';\ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PUTC_LL (ch); }}) >> + >> +static __inline__ void PUTS_LL(char * str) >> +{ >> + =A0 =A0 while (*str) { >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if (*str =3D=3D '\n') { >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PUTC_LL('\r'); >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 } >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PUTC_LL(*str); >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 str++; >> + =A0 =A0 } >> +} >> + >> =A0#else >> =A0# define PUTC_LL(c) do {} while (0) >> =A0# define PUTHEX_LL(v) do {} while (0) >> +# define PUTS_LL(c) do {} while (0) >> >> =A0#endif >> Is there any reason for not using vsprintf in a printf_ll function which would use puts_ll / putc_ll ?? Franck. >> -- >> 1.7.5.4 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> barebox mailing list >> barebox@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox >> > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | > Industrial Linux Solutions =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | http://www.p= engutronix.de/ =A0| > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 =A0= =A0| > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | Fax: =A0 +49-5121-= 206917-5555 | > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox > _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox