From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::231]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VCAeq-0006PJ-4c for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:49:16 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e1so320908qcx.36 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:48:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:48:46 -0400 Message-ID: From: Michael Burkey List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Porting BareBox to Variscite iMX6 SOM To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Sascha, >When doing so please start with a devicetree based board to copy-paste >from. The imx6q-phytec-pbab01 should be a pretty good example. Where does said imx6q-phytec-pbab01 example happen to live? Which brings up another question: I know you were heavily involved in the bring-up of Barebox on the Phyflex iMX6 and in the creation of the BSP (which is still based on 2012.02). When working with iMX6 platforms, which is a better starting point -- the Phytec 2012.02 BSP version, or the current 2013.08 version? Right now I've been working from the 2013.08 version -- but, unless I'm missing something, it doesn't look like the Phyflex support has been incorporated in the mainline Barebox. Thanks! Michael Burkey _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox