From: Masahiro YAMADA <mappyland78@gmail.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Barebox List <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Rockchip: let boards depend on 32/64bit
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 04:59:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATzbQYy0JMkRK=Ni9MykzGX-BcLTFhswgf+nNHGzWQ-=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322140728.4096066-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 11:09 PM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> So far we can enable support for 32bit and 64bit SoCs at the same time
> which results in an unbuildable barebox. This is annoying, let the board
> visibility depend on the selected code model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
What is weird in the current approach is,
none of "make ARCH=arm64 allnoconfig"
"make ARCH=arm64 allyesconfig" sets CONFIG_64BIT.
I think CONFIG_64BIT should be the highest level option,
which is not selected by anyone, and does not depend on
any other CONFIG option.
config 64BIT
bool "64bit" if "$(ARCH)" != "arm64"
default "$(ARCH)" = "arm64"
Then, 32bit-only platforms depend on !64BIT.
and 64bit-only platforms depend on 64BIT.
config ARCH_ZYNQ
bool "zynq (32bit)"
depends on !64BIT
config ARCH_ZYNQMP
bool "zynq (64bit)"
depends on 64BIT
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index abe649de49..2c1783d8e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ config ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> select OFTREE
> select HAVE_PBL_MULTI_IMAGES
> select HAS_DEBUG_LL
> + select CPU_SUPPORTS_32BIT_KERNEL
> + select CPU_SUPPORTS_64BIT_KERNEL
>
> config ARCH_STM32MP
> bool "STMicroelectronics STM32MP"
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
> index 4ac75ab947..9b4913d5da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ config ARCH_RK3288
> config ARCH_ROCKCHIP_V8
> bool
> select CPU_V8
> - select CPU_SUPPORTS_64BIT_KERNEL
> select ARM_ATF
> select RELOCATABLE
>
> @@ -49,6 +48,8 @@ config ARCH_RK3568
>
> comment "select Rockchip boards:"
>
> +if 32BIT
> +
> config MACH_RADXA_ROCK
> select ARCH_RK3188
> select I2C
> @@ -62,6 +63,10 @@ config MACH_PHYTEC_SOM_RK3288
> help
> Say Y here if you are using a RK3288 based Phytecs SOM
>
> +endif
> +
> +if 64BIT
> +
> config MACH_RK3568_EVB
> select ARCH_RK3568
> bool "RK3568 EVB"
> @@ -86,6 +91,8 @@ config MACH_RADXA_ROCK3
> help
> Say Y here if you are using a Radxa ROCK3
>
> +endif
> +
> comment "select board features:"
>
> config ARCH_ROCKCHIP_ATF
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-23 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 14:07 Sascha Hauer
2023-03-23 19:59 ` Masahiro YAMADA [this message]
2023-03-24 10:45 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK7LNATzbQYy0JMkRK=Ni9MykzGX-BcLTFhswgf+nNHGzWQ-=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mappyland78@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox