From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WGWYI-0004gx-9P for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:32:46 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z6so904846yhz.16 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:32:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140205154559.GA16215@pengutronix.de> References: <1391159170-17686-1-git-send-email-freesilicon@gmail.com> <20140204035625.GE9671@ns203013.ovh.net> <20140204065745.GK16215@pengutronix.de> <20140205080001.GX16215@pengutronix.de> <20140205154559.GA16215@pengutronix.de> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:32:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: David Vincent List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Load PBL into SRAM To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Sorry to come back on this subject, but I just synced with the mainline and I noticed that the patch was not fully applied. It was missing the part diff --git a/pbl/Kconfig b/pbl/Kconfig index dc31357..1edc2d1 100644 --- a/pbl/Kconfig +++ b/pbl/Kconfig @@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ config PBL_FORCE_PIGGYDATA_COPY if PBL_IMAGE +config LOAD_PBL_SRAM + bool "Load pbl in SRAM" + help + Load the whole content of the pbl binary into SRAM. This is useful if you + use the pbl as a first stage bootloader but cannot load the whole binary + at the same time. + config PBL_RELOCATABLE depends on ARM bool "relocatable pbl image" which is needed to make everything work. So should I provide a new patch containing only this correction on the mainline ? Best regards, David 2014-02-05 16:45 GMT+01:00 Sascha Hauer : > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:48:45PM +0100, David Vincent wrote: >> Due to the flow of answers, I'm a little lost... What is the status of >> this submission, should I resend it, put more work into it or lose it >> ? > > The latest version looks fine. I applied it now. > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox