mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jianqiang wang <wjq.sec@gmail.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Heap overflow vulnerabilities in network implementation of barebox
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 18:51:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMn3X6NejkLSeyFvJ7Z-0APaUHK8eTWRgFKvbft3SLJp4nO1YQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Dear Barebox devlopers,

I found several heap overflow vulnerabilities in Barebox.

The Barebox implementation assumes that the network packet received is
less than PKTSIZE, that is 1536 bytes. For example, the /net/net.c
file ping_reply function assumes that the packet received is 1536
bytes and allocates a 1536 bytes buffer then copies the packet data
into the buffer.

However, in the driver layer, it lacks a proper check of the packet length.
For example, in drivers/net/cs8900.c cs8900_probe function, it
allocates a PKTSIZE buffer and assigns it to rx_buf. In cs8900_recv
function, the length is read from the device register:

len = readw(priv->regs + CS8900_RTDATA0);

After that, the data is read from the register in a loop without a
boundary check.
The same vulnerability happens to the following drivers:

drivers/net/ks8851_mll.c function ks8851_rx_frame, it only and the
packet length with RXFHBCR_CNT_MASK (4095 bytes,) which is not
consistent with the upper layer length check.

drivers/net/liteeth.c function liteeth_eth_rx, It checks if the length
is larger than 2048 which is inconsistent with the upper layer.

drivers/net/smc911x.c function smc911x_eth_rx. The packet length is
read from the register without checking.

It would be good to add a proper and consistent boundary check for
these drivers otherwise it will lead to potential heap overflow
vulnerability.

Best regards



             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 16:51 jianqiang wang [this message]
2024-05-27  7:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-05-27  9:45   ` jianqiang wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMn3X6NejkLSeyFvJ7Z-0APaUHK8eTWRgFKvbft3SLJp4nO1YQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=wjq.sec@gmail.com \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox