From: Neeraj Pal <neerajpal09@gmail.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Stack buffer overflow WRITE of size 1 in nfs_start function
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 23:36:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANi4_RURqfEKZ311qcDQJ+bD9hdoRfrwb3OKMAGzEoKO2Kyk7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511085845.GG19819@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:28 PM Sascha Hauer <sha@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Ok, so my patch doesn't resolve the whole issue. I just tried the nfs
> command once after a long time now and this really seems to be broken
> in other ways as well. I tend to entirely remove the command instead
> of further trying to fix it. The normal way to handle nfs should be
> to use the NFS filesystem implementation anyway which would be
>
> mount -t nfs $server:/path/to/share /foo
>
> I don't think we have the manpower to maintain two NFS implementations,
> so we shouldn't try to.
Ok, so, it resolves the issue in some way but I think not completely
as it seems that after modifying the strdup return value condition, it
later again got crashed, and, it definitely makes sense and I
completely agree with that as we already have one working
implementation of NFS available so no need to maintain or add the
additional code which provides the similar functionality. So, I also
think that it would be better if we remove any unnecessary code so
that will reduce future issues.
Thanks and regards,
Neeraj
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-17 18:52 Neeraj Pal
2021-05-07 8:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-05-10 11:08 ` Neeraj Pal
2021-05-10 13:18 ` Neeraj Pal
2021-05-11 8:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-05-11 18:06 ` Neeraj Pal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANi4_RURqfEKZ311qcDQJ+bD9hdoRfrwb3OKMAGzEoKO2Kyk7A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=neerajpal09@gmail.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sha@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox