On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > Hi Sascha, > > > > Le Thu, 24 May 2012 22:25:10 +0200, > > Sascha Hauer a écrit : > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05:03PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > enabling SION bit makes SDHC1 working on the i.MX25. > I am a bit surprised since in my case, SDHC1 worked out of the box, after disabling all the iomux pad configuration settings. I believe sync'ing the iomux with the kernel goes both with the philosophy of barebox and its maintainability. > > > Can we instead just sync the iomux file with the kernel? I think this > > > > OK will post the patch syncing barebox & kernel. > > > > > will make less problems in the longer run. At least as long the iomux > > > files in the kernel still exist... > > > > > is iomux settings planned to be removed from the kernel ? > > I suppose when all i.MX are converted to devicetree and pinmux they will > be removed. I don't know how long this will take though. > > Has anybody started on the mx25 conversion to devicetree and pinmux yet? Last time I checked at lot of other fsl cores had already been converted, but not this one. Eric, have you tried moving to your mx25 to device tree yet? Cheers Roberto