From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TOP23-0006em-SA for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:31:16 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id z14so4740884lag.36 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:31:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121017072548.GE30038@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1350410685-46202-1-git-send-email-carlo.caione@gmail.com> <1350410685-46202-5-git-send-email-carlo.caione@gmail.com> <20121016212416.GC27665@pengutronix.de> <20121017065135.GC30038@game.jcrosoft.org> <20121017070139.GM27665@pengutronix.de> <20121017072548.GE30038@game.jcrosoft.org> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: From: Carlo Caione List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) To: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: [cut] > why use a different at the end it the same pin I agree with Jean-Christophe, pins are the same so I don't see why one would use the mini-uart. Best regards, -- Carlo Caione _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox